ArticleJAMA network open2025
E-Cigarette and Cannabis Social Media Posts and Adolescent Substance Use.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scrolling into substance use: Social media use frequency and substance use among U.S. high school students.Drug and alcohol dependence reports · 2026Article
- A study on the impact of social environmental exposure to e-cigarettes on the intention to use them among Chinese middle and high school students and the differences between genders.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Content Analysis of Derived Intoxicating Cannabis Vape Product Attributes and Marketing In an Online Retail Environment.Substance use & misuse · 2026Article
- Cannabis expectancies mediate the association between social media use and cannabis experimentation in early adolescents: A prospective cohort study.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2025Article
- Characterizing the tobacco and nicotine information environment for information seekers on YouTube.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Adolescents are exposed to e-cigarette and cannabis content on social media. Understanding associations of these exposures with use and dual use of these products can guide regulations. Objective: To assess whether adolescent exposure to e-cigarette and/or cannabis content on social media, including posts by various content creators, is associated with e-cigarette, cannabis, and dual use. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two surveys, one longitudinal (study 1, baseline in 2021 to 2022) and one cross-sectional (study 2, fall 2023), were conducted among California high school students who completed questionnaires on computers in classrooms. Exposures: In study 1, the baseline was frequent exposure (weekly or more vs less frequent or none) to e-cigarette and/or cannabis social media posts. In study 2, the exposure (yes vs no) was to e-cigarette and/or cannabis posts from specific sources (friends, celebrities, microinfluencers, e-cigarette and/or cannabis brands, or unknown sources). Main Outcomes and Measures: For study 1, the primary outcome was solo e-cigarette, solo cannabis, or dual use initiation at 1-year follow-up among baseline never-users of e-cigarettes and cannabis. For study 2, the primary outcome was past-month use of e-cigarettes, cannabis, and dual use. Generalized estimating equations models adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, mental health, other tobacco product use, social media use, and social environment. Results: In study 1, of 4232 adolescents (mean [SD] age, 17.0 [0.6] years; 2205 female [52.1%]), 968 (22.9%) reported frequent baseline exposure to e-cigarette posts and 507 (12.0%) reported exposure to cannabis posts on social media, broadly; 567 (13.4%) were frequently exposed to e-cigarette posts specifically on TikTok. Frequent exposure to cannabis social media posts was associated with solo e-cigarette use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.83; 95% CI, 1.11-3.01), solo cannabis use (AOR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.07-2.38), and dual use (AOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.11-2.63) initiation at 1-year follow-up. Frequent exposure to e-cigarette posts on TikTok was associated with solo cannabis use (AOR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.17-2.58) and dual use (e-cigarette and cannabis) initiation (AOR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.19-2.66). In study 2, of 3380 adolescents (mean [SD] age, 17.0 [0.6] years; 1840 female [54.4%]), 195 (5.8%) were exposed to microinfluencer e-cigarette posts, and 152 (4.5%) were exposed to microinfluencer cannabis posts; 151 (4.5%) were exposed to friends' e-cigarette posts, and 161 (4.8%) were exposed to friends' cannabis posts. Exposure to e-cigarette (AOR, 2.67; 95% CI, 1.55-4.59) and cannabis (AOR, 2.14; 95% CI, 1.15-4.00) microinfluencer posts was associated with past-month cannabis use. Exposure to friends' e-cigarette posts was associated with past-month dual use (AOR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.24-5.19), whereas exposure to friends' cannabis posts was associated with past-month cannabis use (AOR, 3.35; 95% CI, 1.94-5.78) and dual use (AOR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.28-4.71). Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of California adolescents, exposure to e-cigarette or cannabis posts was associated with adolescent e-cigarette, cannabis, or dual use. Improvement of social media community guidelines and greater policy attention to co-use and marketing of e-cigarettes and cannabis may help prevent youth substance use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.