ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025
Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Predicts Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Melanoma evolution in the lymph node shapes systemic outcomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Predicting Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma: Emerging Approaches in Digital Pathology, Spatial Profiling and Machine Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer: current treatment paradigms, limitations and future perspectives.BMJ oncology · 2026Review
- Rethinking EPO: A Paradigm Shift in Oncology?Cancers · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCancer treatment has been revolutionized by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). However, a subset of patients do not respond and/or they experience significant adverse events. Attempts to integrate reliable biomarkers of ICI response as part of standard care have been hampered by limited generalizability. We previously reported our supervised machine learning (ML) model in a retrospective cohort of metastatic melanoma. EXPERIMENTAL
designIn this study, we expanded our testing to include larger cohorts of patients with melanoma accrued at several sites, including patients enrolled in clinical trials in both adjuvant and metastatic settings. We examined pretreatment hematoxylin and eosin slides from 639 patients with stage III/IV melanoma treated with ICIs [anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (n = 212), anti-programmed death 1 (n = 271), or the combination (n = 156)]. We tested the generalizability of our supervised ML algorithm to predict response to ICIs in the metastatic melanoma cohort and then developed a self-supervised ML model to identify the histologic morphologies associated with patients' survival following ICI use in adjuvant and metastatic melanoma cohorts.
resultsWe predicted the response to ICI treatment with an AUC of 0.72. The deep convolutional neural network classified patients into high and low risk based on their likelihood of progression-free survival (P < 0.0001). We uncovered a novel association of specific histomorphologic tumor features-epithelioid histology and a low tumor-stroma ratio-with survival following ICI treatment.
conclusionsOur data support the generalizability of our developed ML algorithm in predicting response to ICI treatment in patients with metastatic unresectable melanoma. We also showed, for the first time, tumor features associated with patients' overall survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.