ArticleBiointerphases2025
Spatial mapping of the conformational and mechanical properties of bacterial surface biopolymers.
Article in Biointerphases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Forces acting between an atomic force microscopy silicon nitride cantilever and the bacterial surface biopolymers of Escherichia coli or Pseudomonas putida were spatially probed in water. The interactions were fitted to a model of steric repulsion to estimate the bacterial surface biopolymer brush length and grafting density. The forces were further fitted to a Hertz model of contact mechanics modified by Sneddon et al. to quantify Young's modulus of elasticity for the cells. Contour plots of the quantified properties described above (i.e., the bacterial surface biopolymer brush length and grafting density, and Young's modulus of elasticity for the cells) based on the location coordinates on the bacterial surfaces were generated. Our contour plots indicated the bacterial cells organize their biopolymers uniquely to help them survive in the environment. Specifically, our results showed that the perimeter of a bacterial cell is characterized by a more flexible as well as longer biopolymer brush compared to those estimated at the center top of the cell. These results suggest that bacteria are likely to use their longer brushes on the edges to facilitate their adhesion by bridging surfaces. Also, they maintain their structural reinforcement by developing higher densities of grafted biopolymers and hence higher elasticities at their centers. Moreover, a stronger linear relationship was observed between the brush thicknesses and the grafting densities for the collapsed brush at the center of the cells when compared to the perimeter of the cells.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.