ArticleSpine deformity2025
Neural network-based multi-task learning to assist planning of posterior spinal fusion surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Article in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01792609 (Minimize Implants Maximize Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Minimize Implants Maximize Outcomes (MIMO) Clinical Trial
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- State-of-the-art review in AI and digital technologies for spine deformity.Spine deformity · 2026Review
- AI-derived versus surgeon-performed instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a biomechanical simulation analysis.Spine deformity · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePosterior spinal instrumentation and fusion (PSF) is the gold standard for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), yet instrumentation strategies vary widely, often leading to suboptimal results. Deep learning's potential in AIS planning is underexplored.
methodsThis study trained and validated an artificial neural network multi-task learning model (NNML) using preoperative clinical and radiographic data from 189 AIS patients with Lenke 1A and 2A curves enrolled in the MIMO Clinical Trial (NCT01792609). The model mimics experienced spine surgeons' decision-making for selecting the upper and the lower instrumented vertebrae (UIV, LIV), determining rod curvature, and predicting screw density based on the study's randomized allocation. Models were trained with data from 179 patients, utilizing tenfold cross-validation, and externally validated on 10 patients from a separate hospital and surgeons outside the training set. For UIV and LIV selection, accuracy within the top two predictions was used as a classification performance metric, ensuring that other clinically relevant alternatives were considered.
resultsThe NNML, which comprised 83 inputs and multiple hidden layers, led to significant gains over ST-NN and proved more robust during the internal validation (loss 6.2 vs. 9.3; p ≤ 0.01). It showed 82-95% and 80-100% accuracy for UIV and LIV predictions and 70-90% accuracy for predicting the rod curvatures ± 5°. The RMSE for the screw density and rod curvature predictions was 0.2-0.3 and 3.7-5.6°, respectively.
conclusionAn NNML can better use the features of relevant AIS patients for mixed task prediction pertinent to PSF surgery planning than ST-NN. In addition, NNML was capable of mimicking experienced spine surgeons' decision-making process when designing the instrumentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40553418What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.