Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40553418›Full record

ArticleSpine deformity2025

Neural network-based multi-task learning to assist planning of posterior spinal fusion surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Caroline Constant, A Noelle Larson, David W Polly, Carl-Eric Aubin, Minimize Implants Maximize Outcomes Study Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spine deformity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01792609 (Minimize Implants Maximize Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01792609 nacompletednot on this map

Minimize Implants Maximize Outcomes (MIMO) Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MinnesotaRan2013 to 2019Enrolled200ConditionsScoliosis, Adolescent Idiopathic ScoliosisArmsMaximum Number of Screws, Minimum Number of Screws
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Caroline ConstantDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1 st Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. caroline.constant@uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7846-5612
A Noelle LarsonDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 1 st Street Southwest, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6542-6975
David W PollyDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7572-6584
Carl-Eric AubinPolytechnique Montréal, 2500 Chemin de Polytechnique, Montréal, H3 T 1 J4, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2374-008X
Minimize Implants Maximize Outcomes Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePosterior spinal instrumentation and fusion (PSF) is the gold standard for severe adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), yet instrumentation strategies vary widely, often leading to suboptimal results. Deep learning's potential in AIS planning is underexplored.

methodsThis study trained and validated an artificial neural network multi-task learning model (NNML) using preoperative clinical and radiographic data from 189 AIS patients with Lenke 1A and 2A curves enrolled in the MIMO Clinical Trial (NCT01792609). The model mimics experienced spine surgeons' decision-making for selecting the upper and the lower instrumented vertebrae (UIV, LIV), determining rod curvature, and predicting screw density based on the study's randomized allocation. Models were trained with data from 179 patients, utilizing tenfold cross-validation, and externally validated on 10 patients from a separate hospital and surgeons outside the training set. For UIV and LIV selection, accuracy within the top two predictions was used as a classification performance metric, ensuring that other clinically relevant alternatives were considered.

resultsThe NNML, which comprised 83 inputs and multiple hidden layers, led to significant gains over ST-NN and proved more robust during the internal validation (loss 6.2 vs. 9.3; p ≤ 0.01). It showed 82-95% and 80-100% accuracy for UIV and LIV predictions and 70-90% accuracy for predicting the rod curvatures ± 5°. The RMSE for the screw density and rod curvature predictions was 0.2-0.3 and 3.7-5.6°, respectively.

conclusionAn NNML can better use the features of relevant AIS patients for mixed task prediction pertinent to PSF surgery planning than ST-NN. In addition, NNML was capable of mimicking experienced spine surgeons' decision-making process when designing the instrumentation.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerScoliosisSpinal FusionAdolescentFemaleHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS)Artificial intelligenceDeep learningNeural network multi-task learning modelPosterior spinal fusion (PSF)Preoperative planning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.