Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40553400›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2025

Imaging features of nodular fasciitis: a review of 89 cases.

Mark J Kransdorf, Brandon T Larsen, Mark D Murphey, Jeremiah R Long

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nodular fasciitis of the intradural cervical spine with *MIR22HG::USP6* fusion a rare postoperative occurrence and novel molecular pathogenesis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mark J KransdorfDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ, USA. kransdorf.mark@mayo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0270-4867
Brandon T LarsenDepartment of Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Mark D MurpheyACR Institute for Radiologic Pathology (AIRP), 1100 Wayne Avenue, Suite 1020, Silver Spring, MD, 20910, USA.
Jeremiah R LongDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 E Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review the spectrum of clinical and imaging features of nodular fasciitis, emphasizing those most characteristic of this diagnosis. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective review of our institutional pathology and imaging databases from 2006 to 2024 identified 89 patients with confirmed nodular fasciitis pathology and imaging evaluation. For the purpose of analysis, lesions were subdivided into 2 basic groups: superficial and deep. Superficial lesions were defined as those involving the skin, superficial fascia, subcutaneous fat, and/or extending to the deep fascia. Deep lesions were defined as those localized to the deep fascia or extending deep to the deep fascia, as well as those that were intermuscular or intramuscular.

resultsThere were 45 females and 44 males with an overall average age of 37.3 years (range 1.5-84 years; 68.5% between 20 and 60 years). There were 30 superficial lesions (33.7%) and 59 (66.3%) deep lesions. Deep lesions were on average 65% larger than those located superficially and patients with deep lesions were on average 7.2 years older than those with superficial lesions. While there are no pathognomonic imaging features, careful attention to the relationship of the lesion to the adjacent fascia, as well as to the identification of characteristic time-dependent lesional MR signal changes can be useful aids in identifying this lesion.

conclusionWhile nodular fasciitis is often considered to be an uncommon soft tissue tumor, it is recognized as the third most common benign soft tissue lesion. Knowledge of the spectrum of lesion characteristic locations and appearances will facilitate definitive diagnosis.

Indexed as

FasciitisMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultFascial tailNodular fasciitisPseudosarcomatous fibromatosisSoft tissue tumorSubcutaneous pseudosarcomatous fibromatosis (fasciitis)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.