ArticleSkeletal radiology2025
Imaging features of nodular fasciitis: a review of 89 cases.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Regressing intraneural nodular fasciitis of the femoral nerve.Skeletal radiology · 2026Article
- Nodular fasciitis of the intradural cervical spine with *MIR22HG::USP6* fusion a rare postoperative occurrence and novel molecular pathogenesis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo review the spectrum of clinical and imaging features of nodular fasciitis, emphasizing those most characteristic of this diagnosis. MATERIAL AND
methodsA retrospective review of our institutional pathology and imaging databases from 2006 to 2024 identified 89 patients with confirmed nodular fasciitis pathology and imaging evaluation. For the purpose of analysis, lesions were subdivided into 2 basic groups: superficial and deep. Superficial lesions were defined as those involving the skin, superficial fascia, subcutaneous fat, and/or extending to the deep fascia. Deep lesions were defined as those localized to the deep fascia or extending deep to the deep fascia, as well as those that were intermuscular or intramuscular.
resultsThere were 45 females and 44 males with an overall average age of 37.3 years (range 1.5-84 years; 68.5% between 20 and 60 years). There were 30 superficial lesions (33.7%) and 59 (66.3%) deep lesions. Deep lesions were on average 65% larger than those located superficially and patients with deep lesions were on average 7.2 years older than those with superficial lesions. While there are no pathognomonic imaging features, careful attention to the relationship of the lesion to the adjacent fascia, as well as to the identification of characteristic time-dependent lesional MR signal changes can be useful aids in identifying this lesion.
conclusionWhile nodular fasciitis is often considered to be an uncommon soft tissue tumor, it is recognized as the third most common benign soft tissue lesion. Knowledge of the spectrum of lesion characteristic locations and appearances will facilitate definitive diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40553400What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.