Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40553350›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2025

Advances in Clinical Implications of 3D Printing for Osteochondral Regeneration.

Gozde Enguven, Aysegul Tiryaki, Ayse Ceren Calikoglu Koyuncu, Oguzhan Gunduz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gozde Enguven *Center for Nanotechnology and Biomaterials Applications & Research (NBUAM), Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Aysegul Tiryaki *Center for Nanotechnology and Biomaterials Applications & Research (NBUAM), Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Ayse Ceren Calikoglu KoyuncuCenter for Nanotechnology and Biomaterials Applications & Research (NBUAM), Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye. aceren@marmara.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0318-6037
Oguzhan GunduzCenter for Nanotechnology and Biomaterials Applications & Research (NBUAM), Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteochondral (OC) diseases, which usually occur as a result of the sedentary life brought by today's conditions, lead to a painful and uncomfortable life, especially in later ages. Although there are many non-invasive and invasive methods for the elimination of osteochondral damage, none of them provide full recovery. For this reason, approaches that include advanced tissue engineering techniques are being put forward for the permanent treatment of damage by mimicking the natural tissue architecture. This chapter highlights preclinical and clinical advancements in OC tissue regeneration mainly focused on 3D printing. First, the cellular structure and composition of OC tissue are explained. Next, current strategies for the fabrication of 3D-printed scaffold OC tissue are discussed. Finally, the clinical applications of 3D-printed scaffolds are presented.

Indexed as

Bone RegenerationChondrogenesisPrinting, Three-DimensionalRegenerationTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsAnimalsCartilage, ArticularChondrocytesHumansOsteochondral tissue engineeringRegenerative medicineThree-dimensional printing

Identifiers

PMID40553350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.