Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40553347›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

In Silico Validation of AI-Assisted Drugs in Healthcare.

Subham Kapil, Pankaj Bagga

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Subham KapilDepartment of Biosciences, Division of Zoology & Centre for Green Energy Research, Career Point University, Bhoranj (Tikker-Kharwarian), Hamirpur, Himachal Pradesh, India.
Pankaj BaggaSchool of Bioengineering & Biosciences, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in drug discovery has transformed the medical field by substantially shortening up the process of identifying possible medicinal molecules. In-silico validation, which uses computational approaches to predict the efficacy, safety, and mechanisms of action of drug candidates, has become a critical tool in the early phases of drug development. This strategy combines AI algorithms with molecular modeling, docking, and machine learning approaches to mimic drug-target interactions, allowing potential candidates to be identified prior to experimental testing. AI-assisted drug discovery uses large datasets from biological, chemical, and clinical sources to train models capable of predicting therapeutic efficacy, toxicity, and off-target interactions. In-silico validation minimizes the time and cost of standard drug development approaches while boosting the accuracy and dependability of outcomes. This research investigates the role of AI-assisted in-silico approaches in evaluating medication candidates for a variety of disorders, as well as their potential applications in personalized medicine. Furthermore, it emphasizes AI's ability to solve difficulties such as the complexities of human biology, high drug candidate attrition rates, and the need for more efficient and cost-effective healthcare solutions. Despite limitations in AI model generalization and the need for extensive clinical validation, AI-assisted in-silico methodologies show enormous potential for revolutionizing the future of drug development and healthcare delivery.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputer SimulationDrug DiscoveryAlgorithmsDrug DevelopmentHumansMachine LearningMolecular Docking SimulationPrecision MedicineArtificial intelligence (AI)Drug discoveryDrug-target interactionsIn-silico validationMachine learningMolecular modelingTherapeutic efficacy

Identifiers

PMID40553347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.