ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
One-night catheter stay after Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a single-center comparative study.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHolmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is an effective treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This study aimed to assess the impact of catheterization duration on postoperative outcomes, focusing on re-catheterization rates and associated risk factors.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent HoLEP at our institution (June 2022-August 2024). Starting in November 2023, we decided to attempt catheter removal the morning after the procedure unless contraindicated. Patients were categorized into two groups based on catheterization duration: > 1 day (Group A) and ≤ 1 day (Group B). Perioperative variables, functional outcomes, and re-catheterization rates were compared between the groups. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors of re-catheterization.
results258 patients were analyzed. Baseline characteristics, including age, BMI, IPSS, Q
conclusionEarly catheter removal after HoLEP is safe and effective, reducing re-catheterization risk without compromising outcomes. Early removal may also enhance postoperative recovery by minimizing infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40553309What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.