ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2025
A reproducible framework for synthetic data generation and instance segmentation in robotic suturing.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nail It! A learning framework for autonomous surgical suturing and teleoperation on the dVRK.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Review
- Empowering surgeons with integrated synthetic data: solutions for mastering complex clinical scenarios.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Minimally Invasive and Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery: Major Applications and Recent Advances.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAutomating suturing in robotic-assisted surgery offers significant benefits including enhanced precision, reduced operative time, and alleviated surgeon fatigue. Achieving this requires robust computer vision (CV) models. Still, their development is hindered by the scarcity of task-specific datasets and the complexity of acquiring and annotating real surgical data. This work addresses these challenges using a sim-to-real approach to create synthetic datasets and a data-driven methodology for model training and evaluation.
methodsExisting 3D models of Da Vinci tools were modified and new models-needle and tissue cuts-were created to account for diverse data scenarios, enabling the generation of three synthetic datasets with increasing realism using Unity and the Perception package. These datasets were then employed to train several YOLOv8-m models for object detection to evaluate the generalizability of synthetic-trained models in real scenarios and the impact of dataset realism on model performance. Additionally, a real-time instance segmentation model was developed through a hybrid training strategy combining synthetic and a minimal set of real images.
resultsSynthetic-trained models showed improved performance on real test sets as training dataset realism increased, but realism levels remained insufficient for complete generalization. Instead, the hybrid approach significantly increased performance in real scenarios. Indeed, the hybrid instance segmentation model exhibited real-time capabilities and robust accuracy, achieving the best Dice coefficient (0.92) with minimal dependence on real training data (30-50 images).
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the potential of sim-to-real synthetic datasets to advance robotic suturing automation through a simple and reproducible framework. By sharing 3D models, Unity environments and annotated datasets, this work provides resources for creating additional images, expanding datasets, and enabling fine-tuning or semi-supervised learning. By facilitating further exploration, this work lays a foundation for advancing suturing automation and addressing task-specific dataset scarcity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.