Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40553270›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025

Brain Tumor Stem Cells: New Perspectives.

Alisha Anand, Chitra Venugopal, Sheila K Singh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alisha AnandDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Chitra VenugopalDepartment of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Sheila K SinghDepartment of Biochemistry and Biomedical Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. ssingh@mcmaster.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain cancer remains to be one of the most formidable challenges in oncology, due to its complexity, heterogeneity, and aggressive nature. Despite advances in treatment, many patients continue to face poor prognoses, underscoring the dire need for ongoing research and innovation to address this clinical enigma. Brain tumor stem cells (BTSCs) have shown to play a significant factor in the transformation and progression of brain tumors. This distinct subpopulation of cancer cells exhibit key characteristics remnant of neural stem cells (NSCs) including self-renewal and asymmetric differentiation. They are also characterized by abhorrent signaling pathways, metabolic processes, and immune surveillance. Current methods utilize fluorescent-activated cell sorting (FAC) methods to isolate and enrich for BTSCs based on cell surface markers. In this chapter, we review the current challenges in BTSC research, highlighting the anomalies of BTSCs and their surrounding niche that lead to therapeutic resistance and relapse. Current and prospective research are explored to address these challenges, including innovative technologies such as single cell RNA sequencing captures genetic and transcriptomic information on the single-cell level. Screening methods utilizing CRISPR technology are discussed to identify targetable vulnerabilities. Finally, with the advent of artificial intelligence (AI), current research utilizing AI and machine learning are explored to introduce novel therapeutic targets and improved diagnostic tools.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsNeoplastic Stem CellsAnimalsFlow CytometryHumansNeural Stem CellsSingle-Cell AnalysisArtificial IntelligenceBrain Tumor Stem CellsCell surface makersCRISPR-Cas9 systemFluorescent activated cell sortingIntratumoral HeterogeneityMachine LearningSingle-cell RNA sequencingStandard of CareTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.