ArticleCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2025
Feasibility of guiding catheter exchange using extension wire in percutaneous coronary intervention after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Article in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical expert consensus document on rotational atherectomy from the Japanese association of cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics: update 2026.Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is technically challenging because of the presence of the transcatheter heart valve (THV), which complicates coronary artery engagement. Owing to their flexibility, diagnostic catheters (DCs) facilitate coronary access, but require subsequent exchange to guiding catheters (GCs) for PCI. The feasibility of using an extension wire (EW) to facilitate DC-to-GC exchange in this context remains unexplored. A retrospective analysis was conducted at our institution, examining 11 PCI cases performed after TAVR between January 6, 2020, and June 1, 2024, in which an EW was employed to transition from a DC to a GC. Clinical, angiographic, and procedural data were reviewed. Procedural success was defined as a successful DC-to-GC exchange and completion of PCI. DC-to-GC exchange using an EW was successfully achieved in all 11 cases (100%). Revascularization was achieved in 10/11 cases (91%). The lesions were uniformly classified as American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Type B2/C. The GCs included Judkins-type in 7/11 cases (64%) and backup-type in 4/11 cases (36%). The THV types included SAPIEN in 6/11 cases (55%), Evolut in 3/11 cases (27%), and Navitor in 2/11 cases (18%). A 6Fr GC was utilized in 10/11 cases (91%), and rotational atherectomy was performed in 1/11 cases (9%). The use of an EW to facilitate the transition from DC to GC in PCI after TAVR resulted in high procedural success, providing a feasible approach for addressing complex lesions and optimizing procedural outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40553261What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.