Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40553239›Full record

ReviewBiological trace element research2026

Toxicity Challenges and Current Advancement in Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFs) for Biomedical Applications.

Mubbashar Abbas, Zhiwei Liang, Min Chen, Wei Qu, Suliman Khan, Muhammad Sameer Ashaq, Dongmei Chen, Shuyu Xie

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Biological trace element research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Aminal-linked Covalent Organic Frameworks for Light Energy Upconversion.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Reticular Frameworks for Advanced Polymer Materials.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mubbashar AbbasNational Reference Laboratory of Veterinary Drug Residues (HZAU) and MAO Key Laboratory for Detection of Veterinary Drug Residues, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Zhiwei LiangKey Laboratory of Prevention & Control for African Swine Fever and Other Major Pig Diseases, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Min ChenKey Laboratory of Prevention & Control for African Swine Fever and Other Major Pig Diseases, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Wei QuNational Reference Laboratory of Veterinary Drug Residues (HZAU) and MAO Key Laboratory for Detection of Veterinary Drug Residues, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Suliman KhanNational Reference Laboratory of Veterinary Drug Residues (HZAU) and MAO Key Laboratory for Detection of Veterinary Drug Residues, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China.
Muhammad Sameer AshaqDepartment of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Defense Road, Lahore, Pakistan.
Dongmei ChenNational Reference Laboratory of Veterinary Drug Residues (HZAU) and MAO Key Laboratory for Detection of Veterinary Drug Residues, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China. dmchen1027@163.com.
Shuyu XieNational Reference Laboratory of Veterinary Drug Residues (HZAU) and MAO Key Laboratory for Detection of Veterinary Drug Residues, Wuhan, 430070, Hubei, China. snxsy1@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are highly versatile porous crystalline polymers with diverse structural compositions, high porosity, and biocompatibility, which guarantees their significant potential in various biomedical applications, including drug delivery, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and biosensing. However, despite these promising features, MOFs' application is considerably hindered by main challenges such as toxicity and biocompatibility. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of MOF-associated toxicity, and the challenges involved in their biomedical applications. We first addressed the different routes of MOFs exposure, such as oral ingestion, inhalation, skin, and intravenous routes, and their potential contribution to MOF-associated toxicity. Further, we focused on drug delivery systems, MRI contrast agents, and biosensors, along with their key challenges, like how toxicity issues affect their efficacy and safety. The key biological mechanisms involved in MOF-induced toxicity were also critically examined, such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and autophagy disruption. Moreover, we evaluated how MOFs' toxicity prolife is influenced by their physicochemical properties such as MOFs' composition, size and shape, surface characteristics, biodegradability, and stability. The current advancements were also illustrated to address these challenges and to minimize the toxicity with enhancement in therapeutic performance, such as the development of stimuli-responsive drug delivery systems and MOF-based composites with better biocompatibility and efficacy. Overall, this review enlightens the need for novel strategies to overcome the current challenges in MOFs' biomedical applications. Future research should focus on the evaluation of systematic toxicity and development of novel, suitable MOF-based composites to ensure their safety and efficacy.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsMetal-Organic FrameworksAnimalsBiosensing TechniquesContrast MediaDrug Delivery SystemsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingBiocompatible MaterialsContrast MediaMetal-Organic FrameworksAutophagy disruptionBiomedical applicationsMetal–organic frameworks (MOFs)Mitochondrial dysfunctionOxidative stressToxicity factorsToxicity mechanisms

Identifiers

PMID40553239

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.