ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
Refining cardiac segmentation from MRI volumes with CT labels for fine anatomy of the ascending aorta.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is time-consuming, posing challenges in capturing clear images of moving organs, such as cardiac structures, including complex structures such as the Valsalva sinus. This study evaluates a computed tomography (CT)-guided refinement approach for cardiac segmentation from MRI volumes, focused on preserving the detailed shape of the Valsalva sinus. Owing to the low spatial contrast around the Valsalva sinus in MRI, labels from separate computed tomography (CT) volumes are used to refine the segmentation. Deep learning techniques are employed to obtain initial segmentation from MRI volumes, followed by the detection of the ascending aorta's proximal point. This detected proximal point is then used to select the most similar label from CT volumes of other patients. Non-rigid registration is further applied to refine the segmentation. Experiments conducted on 20 MRI volumes with labels from 20 CT volumes exhibited a slight decrease in quantitative segmentation accuracy. The CT-guided method demonstrated the precision (0.908), recall (0.746), and Dice score (0.804) for the ascending aorta compared with those obtained by nnU-Net alone (0.903, 0.770, and 0.816, respectively). Although some outputs showed bulge-like structures near the Valsalva sinus, an improvement in quantitative segmentation accuracy could not be validated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40553227What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.