ArticleInternational forum of allergy & rhinology2025
Accurate Detection of Cerebrospinal Fluid by DNA Aptamers Derived by Clinical Samples.
Article in International forum of allergy & rhinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accurate Detection of Cerebrospinal Fluid by DNA Aptamers Derived by Clinical Samples.International forum of allergy & rhinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
key pointsNovel DNA aptamers CSF-APT-1 and CSF-APT-2 accurately detected cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in 19 patient samples. Sequencing confirmed CSF-APT-1 and CSF-APT-2 as superior CSF detection probes over other candidates from the same in vitro selection. Use of CSF-APT-1 and CSF-APT-2, which are specific to CSF, may offer improvements in speed and accuracy compared to current CSF diagnostics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.