ArticleEnvironmental microbiology2025
Saprotrophic Capabilities of Neurospora crassa on Charred Plant Biomass.
Article in Environmental microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Upcycling Oat Hulls via Solid-State Fermentation Using Edible Filamentous Fungi: A Co-Culture Approach withJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Saprotrophic Capabilities of Neurospora crassa on Charred Plant Biomass.Environmental microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neurospora crassa is a popular model organism for laboratory research, yet its natural ecology remains mysterious. Its proliferation on charred plant biomass (wood and grasses) in fire-affected environments is often linked to the heat tolerance or heat-/chemical-induced germination of N. crassa spores; however, this link is not consistent across ecosystems or substrate types. Another possible, yet unvalidated, explanation is that N. crassa has an enhanced capacity for degrading charred (i.e., pyrolyzed) plant biomass. We assessed this adaptation for N. crassa by quantifying the decay of wood and grasses that were pyrolyzed to relevant extents (untreated, heated at 225°C or 350°C for 20 min) and by comparing this decay with non-fire-associated fungi. Neurospora crassa did not have an enhanced ability to degrade pyrolyzed substrates. Additionally, N. crassa struggled to degrade any wood substrate (< 6% mass loss) but did degrade untreated grasses (> 20% mass loss). These results, paired with chemical analyses of substrates pre- and post-decay, support a fire-response strategy for N. crassa, rather than a fire-adaptive ability to degrade charred substrates. This fungus likely proliferates on charred biomass by rapidly colonising heat-sterilised substrates after heat- or smoke-induced spore germination and then consuming unpyrolyzed lignocellulose beneath a charred exterior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.