ReviewJournal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Is Rifampin (Rifampicin) Essential for the Treatment of Rhodococcus equi Infections in Foals? A Critical Review of the Role of Rifampin.
Review in Journal of veterinary pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rifampin is an enigma among antimicrobials. Blood and tissue compartment concentrations are a "moving target" along the treatment course due to the complex pharmacodynamic interactions within the body. Rifampin concomitant therapies are for the prevention and treatment of Rhodococcus equi infection in foals, for nearly 40 years. The necessity of rifampin concomitant therapies is based on beliefs that both antimicrobials (e.g., rifampin plus macrolide) penetrate into pulmonary abscesses and intracellular compartments above R. equi minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs), as well as better efficacy, compared with other approaches, and limiting the rate of antimicrobial resistance to either single agent. However, rifampin acts as a perpetrator drug for many co-administered drugs. This critical review evaluates the available evidence for rifampin use in foals with R. equi , concerning pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of rifampin in foals, in vitro microbiological studies and selection of antimicrobial resistance, as well as an analysis of randomized clinical trials. Rifampin is a nuclear pregnane X receptor activator, which results in strong negative drug interactions towards itself and other drugs, for drug-absorption routes either by upregulation of presystemic elimination mechanisms (e.g., intestinal and hepatic CYP3A4), or functional drug-absorption carriers (e.g., intestinal P-glycoprotein) and/or inhibition of intestinal and/or hepatic drug-uptake carriers (e.g., OATP1B1, OATP2B1, MRP2). Chronic rifampin administration results in decreases in the serum and target site/s concentrations of many parent drugs, including itself. Rifampin concomitant therapies do not demonstrate a significant advantage over monotherapy with macrolides, in randomized controlled blinded and double-blinded clinical trials for subclinical, and mild-to-moderate bronchopneumonia in foals with pulmonary abscesses, regardless of initial pulmonary abscess score. Efficacy of rifampin concomitant therapies for severe Rhodococcus equi pneumonia has not been fully investigated, but there is sufficient accumulated evidence in foals to raise major concerns about the incorrect use of rifampin in equine medicine. These concerns include rifampin as a bacteriostatic antibiotic against R. equi , with changing pharmacokinetics during treatment that decreases parent/coparent concentrations as well as the risk of selecting for multi-resistant R. equi .
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.