ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2025
Uptake of virtual reality in outpatient hysteroscopy: a prospective observational study.
Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This prospective cohort study evaluated virtual reality (VR) use during outpatient hysteroscopy in a UK tertiary hospital (Nov 2022-Apr 2023). Of 105 eligible women, 38 (36.2%) used VR; most who declined preferred to remain undistracted. Mean pain score was 5.5, slightly lower than the expected 5.7. Mild side effects included dizziness and claustrophobia. Nearly all users (94.7%) would recommend VR, and all rated it "acceptable" or "very acceptable." While VR may improve patient experience, limited uptake highlights the importance of tailoring pain management to individual preferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.