ArticleOral health & preventive dentistry2025
Assessment of Interdental Space and Satisfaction Change in Interdental Toothbrush Size Application and Usage According to Interdental Gap Measurement.
Article in Oral health & preventive dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Optimizing implant hygiene: the added value of interproximal cleaning devices around implant-supported restorations-a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of implant dentistry · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the impact of interdental toothbrush size on subjective satisfaction among users. MATERIALS AND
methodsA survey was conducted among interdental toothbrush users visiting a dental clinic in Busan, South Korea. Participants were asked about their interdental toothbrush usage and satisfaction levels. The interdental spaces were measured, and appropriate toothbrush sizes were provided accordingly.
resultsA notable increase in subjective satisfaction was found when participants used interdental toothbrushes tailored to their interdental space. Statistical analysis revealed a statistically significant correlation between toothbrush size and satisfaction levels.
conclusionsInterdental toothbrush size statistically significantly influences subjective satisfaction. To promote oral health, it is imperative to educate individuals about selecting the appropriate toothbrush size. Furthermore, standardisation of interdental toothbrush sizes is recommended to streamline educational efforts and improve user experience across populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.