Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40552650›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2025

Analysis of Drugs in Whole Blood by Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry with Integrated Solid-Phase Extraction.

Greta Ren, Brandon J Bills, Nicholas E Manicke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Greta RenDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States.
Brandon J BillsDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States.
Nicholas E ManickeDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2296-0497

Funding

All-in-one Device for Forensic Toxicology Drug ScreeningR44DA056319 · NIDA · WIK DEVICES, LLC · PI WISEMAN, JUSTIN MICHAEL · 2022 to 2024
$2.0M
Sensitive and Rapid Screening of Synthetic Drugs by Mass SpectrometryR21DA043037 · NIDA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI MANICKE, NICHOLAS E · 2017 to 2018
$411k
NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA043037NIDA NIH HHS R44 DA056319
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continued rise in overdoses, driven by fentanyl and novel psychoactive substances (NPS), underscores the need for improved methods for drug screening. Traditional analytical techniques involving chromatography can be time-consuming and require sample preparation. Paper spray mass spectrometry (PS-MS) can rapidly detect analytes from complex matrices. However, challenges such as matrix effects can lead to higher detection limits, prompting improvements aimed at preconcentrating or cleaning up samples. While most methods focus on plasma analysis, there is a need to further simplify sample preparation, particularly for whole blood. Here, we report on three-dimensional (3D)-printed devices that preconcentrate drugs from whole blood for PS-MS analysis. An uncontrolled amount of blood was added to the blood reservoir part of the cartridge. The capillary fills and then rotates to sit on top of the SPE column. The blood wicks through the SPE to the waste pad, and the sample is left to dry until analysis. The dry SPE holder is "snapped" in the paper spray cartridge. A variety of parameters were optimized to improve manufacturing and the performance of the device, including waste pad substrates, SPE sorbents, and binders; the size of the SPE compartment; the amount of SPE; a water wash step; and blood volume. Performance was tested with 21 different drugs including opioids like fentanyl and isotonitazene, cathinones, designer and prescription benzodiazepines, cocaine, methamphetamine, and synthetic cannabinoids. Dried blood samples were found to be stable for at least 14 days. The detection limits were at single digit or subng/mL levels or lower for all analytes for 70 μL blood sample, with a median decrease of 9-fold compared to paper spray without SPE.

Indexed as

Mass SpectrometryPaperSolid Phase ExtractionHumans

Identifiers

PMID40552650
PMCPMC12314926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.