ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2025
Pharmacogenetic Implementation Studies-Lessons Learned From the PREPARE Study.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- BioFRAM PGx, an Implementation Proposal for Pharmacogenetics in the Spanish National Health System.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The evolving landscape of pharmacogenomics: Current achievements and future directions.Pharmacological reviews · 2026Review
- The role of pharmacogenomics in personalized medicine.Croatian medical journal · 2026Article
- Implementation of preemptive pharmacogenetic testing: progress, puzzles and priorities from an implementation science perspective.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Near, far, wherever you are: phenotype-related variation in pharmacogenomic effect sizes across the psychiatric drug literature.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
38 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Ubiquitous Pharmacogenomics consortium (www.upgx.eu) has recently completed and published the Preemptive Pharmacogenomic Testing for Preventing Adverse Drug Reactions (PREPARE) study on the implementation of panel-based pharmacogenetic testing. PREPARE has provided interesting lessons for the design, execution, and interpretation of future clinical implementation studies. In this paper, we share our experience and lessons learned from the PREPARE study for future pharmacogenetic implementation studies. Issues addressed are the study population, intervention, endpoint, randomization, blinding, crossover, ethics, real-world changes during the study, and data analysis and reporting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.