Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40552550›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of biological anthropology2025

Adapting Clinical Tooth Wear Assessment Methods for Biological Anthropology Contexts.

Ian Towle, Luca Fiorenza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of biological anthropology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ian TowleBiomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Luca FiorenzaBiomedicine Discovery Institute, Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7110-3398

Funding

Australian Research Council DP240101081
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTooth wear is increasingly recognized as an adaptive process that can help optimize mastication and maintain oral health. In this study, we apply clinical wear-assessment methods to quantify occlusal tissue loss in first molars of seven Australian Aboriginal individuals from Yuendumu (1950s-1970s), whose diet combined traditional hunter-gatherer foods with processed Western items. MATERIALS AND

methodsHigh-resolution surface scans of dental casts were analyzed using WearCompare to assess wear patterns during dental development and evaluate the applicability of these tools in a biological anthropology context.

resultsClinical methods designed for assessing pathological wear can effectively capture normal physiological wear in populations with medium-high tissue loss rates. Average annual tissue loss was 4 mm DISCUSSION: These findings highlight the utility of digital quantification of dental tissue loss for anthropological research. In particular, these methods have significant potential for assessing tooth wear in contemporary human and non-human primate samples, and for refining macroscopic wear scoring systems in paleontological and archaeological contexts by using modern analogues for calibration and refinement. These methods can also complement other wear analysis techniques (e.g., microwear analysis, occlusal fingerprint analysis), as well as studies on tooth morphology and structure, offering broader applications in evolutionary inferences and dietary reconstructions.

Indexed as

MolarTooth WearAdultAnthropology, PhysicalAustraliaDietFemaleHumansMalecraniofacial growthdental attritiondental tissue lossdigital anthropologyWearCompare

Identifiers

PMID40552550
PMCPMC12186214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.