Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40552493›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2025

COCA: a randomized Bayesian design integrating dose optimization and component contribution assessment for combination therapies.

Xiaohan Chi, Ruitao Lin, Ying Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaohan ChiDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0009-0002-1523-4574
Ruitao LinDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2244-131X
Ying YuanDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3163-480X

Funding

Tropism Enhanced Oncolytic Adenovirus for the Treatment of Brain TumorsP50CA127001 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Juan Fueyo · 2008 to 2026
$41.2M
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center SPORE in Ovarian CancerP50CA281701 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Ying Yuan · 2023 to 2026
$11.5M
Project 3: Inhibiting Oxidative Phosphorylation in Pancreatic CancerP50CA221707 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KOPETZ, SCOTT, MAITRA, ANIRBAN · 2019 to 2023
$11.0M
Coordinating and Data Management Center for Translational and Basic Science Research in Early LesionsU24CA274212 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Liang Li, Ying Yuan · 2022 to 2026
$3.5M
Bayesian Methods for Complex Precision Biotherapy Trials in OncologyR01CA261978 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI LIN, RUITAO, THALL, PETER F · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
Novel designs for multi-arm multi-dose multi-stage platform trialsR21LM014699 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Ruitao Lin · 2025 to 2026
$405k
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA127001NCI NIH HHS P50CA127001NCI NIH HHS P50 CA221707NCI NIH HHS P50CA221707NCI NIH HHS P50 CA281701NCI NIH HHS P50CA281701NCI NIH HHS R01 CA261978NCI NIH HHS U24 CA274212NCI NIH HHS U24CA274212NIH HHS R01CA261978NIH HHS R21LM014699NLM NIH HHS R21 LM014699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In cancer treatment, the development of combination therapies requires demonstrating the contribution of each individual drug and optimizing the dose during early-phase trials. This necessitates a large sample size, presenting formidable obstacles for drug developers. To address this issue, we propose a 2-stage randomized phase II design that seamlessly integrates combination dose optimization with component contribution assessment. In stage 1, the optimal combination dose is determined by maximizing the risk-benefit tradeoff across multiple candidate combination doses. In stage 2, a multi-arm randomized phase is initiated to evaluate the contribution of each component within the combination therapy. To increase trial efficiency and reduce the sample size, efficacy data from both stages are adaptively combined using a Bayesian logistic regression model with a spike-and-slab prior. The sample size and decision cutoffs of the proposed design are systematically determined based on a novel calibration procedure to achieve desired operating characteristics. Extensive simulation studies show that the proposed design achieves the dual goals of dose optimization and contribution assessment, while yielding substantial sample size savings compared to competing designs.

Indexed as

Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicBayes TheoremClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Therapy, CombinationHumansLogistic ModelsNeoplasmsSample Sizecombination therapycomponent contributiondose optimizationinformation borrowingmulti-arm randomized trial

Identifiers

PMID40552493
PMCPMC12206157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.