ArticleBiometrics2025
COCA: a randomized Bayesian design integrating dose optimization and component contribution assessment for combination therapies.
Article in Biometrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In cancer treatment, the development of combination therapies requires demonstrating the contribution of each individual drug and optimizing the dose during early-phase trials. This necessitates a large sample size, presenting formidable obstacles for drug developers. To address this issue, we propose a 2-stage randomized phase II design that seamlessly integrates combination dose optimization with component contribution assessment. In stage 1, the optimal combination dose is determined by maximizing the risk-benefit tradeoff across multiple candidate combination doses. In stage 2, a multi-arm randomized phase is initiated to evaluate the contribution of each component within the combination therapy. To increase trial efficiency and reduce the sample size, efficacy data from both stages are adaptively combined using a Bayesian logistic regression model with a spike-and-slab prior. The sample size and decision cutoffs of the proposed design are systematically determined based on a novel calibration procedure to achieve desired operating characteristics. Extensive simulation studies show that the proposed design achieves the dual goals of dose optimization and contribution assessment, while yielding substantial sample size savings compared to competing designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.