Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40552455›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council2025

The Homo erectus Female Revisited.

Leslie C Aiello

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Homo erectus Female Revisited.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Leslie C AielloWenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research, New York, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9546-0963

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Energetic Consequences of Being a Homo erectus Female was published in the American Journal of Human Biology over two decades ago. This paper drew attention to the high body-size-related reproductive costs of an H. erectus female if she retained the same reproductive schedule of smaller-bodied earlier hominins modeled on the schedule for modern Pan. The main conclusion was that the energetic cost per offspring would be significantly reduced by adopting a modern human reproductive schedule with a shorter lactation period and an overall shorter interbirth interval. To make this possible and support the energetic requirements of the larger body size, there would have had to be a fundamental shift in subsistence behavior involving a higher-quality diet and intergenerational cooperation in food acquisition. This paper re-evaluates these conclusions based on recent energetic research developments. Although the modeling parameters have changed, the conclusions are still valid. Their implications are discussed in light of modern research on the increase in body and brain size and the evolution of cooperative subsistence behavior.

Indexed as

Body SizeEnergy MetabolismHominidaeReproductionAnimalsBiological EvolutionFemaleHumansbody sizeenergeticsHomo erectushuman evolutionreproduction

Identifiers

PMID40552455
PMCPMC12186136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.