ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2025
Adaptive Machine Learning for Electronic Nose-Based Forensic VOC Classification.
Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temperature-Modulated MEMS Gas Sensor Array Enabled by Physics-Informed Deep Learning for Thermal-Runaway Characteristic Gas Discrimination.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Boosting Artificial Olfaction: Visual Cues-Enhanced Gas Classification by a Bimodal Neuromorphic Device.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Recent Advances and Unaddressed Challenges in Biomimetic Olfactory- and Taste-Based Biosensors: Moving Towards Integrated, AI-Powered, and Market-Ready Sensing Systems.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Adaptive Machine Learning for Electronic Nose-Based Forensic VOC Classification.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Odor detection as forensic evidence is an emerging and transformative approach for identifying individuals in cases where conventional techniques- such as DNA profiling, fingerprints, or gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy- are insufficient. Key challenges include distinguishing between living and deceased individuals, differentiating human from animal remains, and estimating postmortem intervals. While specially trained dogs remain the gold standard in some contexts, there is growing demand for faster, scalable, and cost-effective alternatives. Here, a bio-inspired electronic nose comprising 32 metal-oxide sensors, integrated with machine learning, is presented as a non-invasive, real-time, and reliable tool for volatile organic compound profiling. The system accurately classifies postmortem versus antemortem human biosamples (98.1%), discriminates human from animal tissue (97.2%), and estimates postmortem intervals with high temporal resolution. This study introduces a robust AI-driven olfactory platform for forensic scent detection, highlighting its potential to complement or replace traditional methods. By coupling volatilome analysis with sensor miniaturization and algorithmic refinement, this approach lays the groundwork for next-generation forensic diagnostics and odor-based biomarker discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.