ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025
Comparison of intra-and interobserver reliability analysis of orientation proximal femur physis parameters on radiographs.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The orientation of proximal femur physis is important as it can cause 3-dimensional deformity of the proximal femur. Recently, authors have described various parameters to describe the orientation of proximal femur physis. Therefore, we aim to compare the intra and interobserver reliability of these parameters in this study. Methods: Radiographs of the bilateral hip with the pelvis of children between 1 and 10 years of age were retrieved from the hospital archives to measure the Physeal orientation angle (PO), Physeal tilt angle (PTA), Head shaft angle (HSA), and Alsberg angle (AA). Intra- and inter-observer reliability was tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient and Cronbach's alpha respectively by three independent observers at two separate times, two weeks apart. Results: The total analysis included 179 radiographs, including 378 hips. PO, PTA, HSA, and AA had values ranging from 9.57 Conclusion: The study found that PTA, AA, and HSA have shown good reliability, but they may not accurately represent the true orientation of the capital femoral physis with respect to the femoral neck. For routine follow-up, PO may be a suitable alternative. However, it is not as reliable as other parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.