ArticleFood science & nutrition2025
Prevalence and Determinants of the Composite Index of Anthropometric Failure in Children Under Five Years in Bangladesh: Insights From a National Survey.
Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors Associated With Composite Anthropometric Failures (CIAF) Among Under Five Children in Lesotho: An Insight From the 2023 to 2024 Demographic and Health Survey Data.Food science & nutrition · 2026Article
- Malnutrition Among Children Under Five in Djibouti: A Composite Index of Anthropometric Failure Analysis from the 2023 Multisectoral Survey.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Determinants of Eating Behaviors Among School-Going Children in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nutrition and metabolic insights · 2026Article
- Prevalence and Determinants of the Composite Index of Anthropometric Failure in Children Under Five Years in Bangladesh: Insights From a National Survey.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Child undernutrition remains a significant public health issue in Bangladesh, with high rates of stunting, wasting, and underweight. The Composite Index of Anthropometric Failure (CIAF) offers a comprehensive tool for assessing overall undernutrition. Although previous studies in Bangladesh have utilized CIAF, they have relied on older datasets. Estimating the current status is essential for designing and implementing targeted interventions due to the dynamic nature of undernutrition. This study aimed to provide updated insights by analyzing the CIAF and its determinants among children under 5 years, using the most recent 2022 Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) data. A total of 3950 under-5-year-old children were included. The modified Poisson regression was employed to identify the associated factors. The overall prevalence of CIAF was 33.7%, with subgroups of wasted and underweight (4.7%), stunted and underweight (10.8%), wasting, stunting, and underweight (3.4%), only wasted (3%), only stunted (8.8%), and only underweight (3%). Factors associated with higher risk of CIAF included older aged child, higher birth order (ARR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.08-1.58), smaller birth size (ARR: 1.45, 95% CI: 1.24-1.70), uneducated mothers (ARR: 1.49, 95% CI: 1.16-1.93), maternal underweight (ARR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.13-1.46), short stature (ARR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.40-1.70). Children from the poorest households (ARR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.02-1.53) and Sylhet (ARR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.02-1.47) also had a higher risk. This study suggests strengthening community-based nutrition-specific programs along with improving access to healthcare, family planning, food assistance, and income opportunities to reduce child undernutrition in Bangladesh.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.