ArticleAdversity and resilience science2020
Early Environmental Exposures and Contaminants: a Design Framework for Biospecimen Collection and Analysis for a Prospective National Birth Cohort.
Article in Adversity and resilience science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biospecimens in the HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) Study: Rationale and protocol.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- The HEALthy Brain and Child Development Study (HBCD): NIH collaboration to understand the impacts of prenatal and early life experiences on brain development.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Remote and at-home data collection: Considerations for the NIH HEALthy Brain and Cognitive Development (HBCD) study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Identifying factors associated with disruptions in early neurodevelopment is imperative for promoting the health and wellbeing of children. We describe a design framework for biospecimen collection for the forthcoming HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) study, which seeks to establish a large cohort of pregnant women throughout the USA and follow their children into middle childhood. Biospecimens and biological outcomes of interest, together with validated questionnaires and other measures, may help to disentangle the effect of prenatal exposures from social and environment factors that extend across the prenatal and postnatal periods, including early life adversity (ELA). Biospecimen selection is discussed across four domains of interest: (a) substance use exposure, (b) other environmental exposures, (c) genomics and epigenomics, and (d) other biological markers of neurodevelopment and putative moderators and mediators of developmental effects. HBCD biospecimen working group recommendations were based on nine guiding principles including utility as a biomarker to assess neurodevelopment; feasibility of collection during critical periods of exposure with a broad detection window; logistics and cost of specimen collection, storage, and transportation; cultural acceptability; minimal invasiveness; flexibility; high sensitivity and specificity; anticipated expertise and infrastructure at participating sites; and availability of informative alternative non-biological measures. The proposed essential and recommended biospecimens will need to be integrated with the recommendations from other HBCD working groups to ascertain overall burden for the research participants and families, feasibility of multi-modal collection at each study visit, cost, and implications for recruitment and retention, as well as any potential legal repercussions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.