Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40552312›Full record

ArticleAdversity and resilience science2020

Early Environmental Exposures and Contaminants: a Design Framework for Biospecimen Collection and Analysis for a Prospective National Birth Cohort.

Julie M Croff, Ryan Bogdan, Sara B Johnson, Ludmila N Bakhireva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Adversity and resilience science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Julie M CroffNational Center for Wellness & Recovery & Department of Rural Health, Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, 1111 W 17th Street, Tulsa, OK, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0415-3237
Ryan BogdanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1430-1045
Sara B JohnsonDepartment of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4532-1847
Ludmila N BakhirevaDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, University of New Mexico School of Pharmacy, Albuquerque, NM, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9877-0211

Funding

The Impact of Maternal Adversity and Attachment Security on Infant Stress Reactivity: Prenatal Epigenetic PathwaysP20GM109097 · NIGMS · OSU CENTER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Dian Yu · 2016 to 2026
$22.8M
3/7: Longitudinal Evaluation of the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on High-Risk New and Expectant MothersR34DA050272 · NIDA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ROGERS, CYNTHIA ELISE, SMYSER, CHRISTOPHER DANIEL · 2019 to 2020
$688k
Understanding the effects of COVID-19 on maternal substance useR34DA050343 · NIDA · OSU CENTER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES · PI CROFF, JULIE MAY, MORRIS, AMANDA S · 2019 to 2020
$598k
HEALthy ORCHARD: Developing plans for a Baltimore site of the HEALthy BCD studyR34DA050292 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FALLIN, M DANIELE · 2019 to 2019
$567k
6/6 Planning for the HEALthy Early Development StudyR34DA050237 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI BAKHIREVA, LUDMILA NICOLE, LEEMAN, LAWRENCE M · 2019 to 2019
$542k
NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA050237NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA050272NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA050292NIDA NIH HHS R34 DA050343NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identifying factors associated with disruptions in early neurodevelopment is imperative for promoting the health and wellbeing of children. We describe a design framework for biospecimen collection for the forthcoming HEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD) study, which seeks to establish a large cohort of pregnant women throughout the USA and follow their children into middle childhood. Biospecimens and biological outcomes of interest, together with validated questionnaires and other measures, may help to disentangle the effect of prenatal exposures from social and environment factors that extend across the prenatal and postnatal periods, including early life adversity (ELA). Biospecimen selection is discussed across four domains of interest: (a) substance use exposure, (b) other environmental exposures, (c) genomics and epigenomics, and (d) other biological markers of neurodevelopment and putative moderators and mediators of developmental effects. HBCD biospecimen working group recommendations were based on nine guiding principles including utility as a biomarker to assess neurodevelopment; feasibility of collection during critical periods of exposure with a broad detection window; logistics and cost of specimen collection, storage, and transportation; cultural acceptability; minimal invasiveness; flexibility; high sensitivity and specificity; anticipated expertise and infrastructure at participating sites; and availability of informative alternative non-biological measures. The proposed essential and recommended biospecimens will need to be integrated with the recommendations from other HBCD working groups to ascertain overall burden for the research participants and families, feasibility of multi-modal collection at each study visit, cost, and implications for recruitment and retention, as well as any potential legal repercussions.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBiospecimenHEALthy Brain and Child Development (HBCD)NeurodevelopmentPrenatal environment

Identifiers

PMID40552312
PMCPMC12183738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.