ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Nanoemulsion of myricetin enhances its anti-tumor activity in nude mice of triple-negative breast cancer xenografts.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- TrxR Inhibition and Nrf2-FOXO3 Modulation by Repurposed Drugs: A Redox Strategy to Reverse Cancer Multidrug Resistance.Drug development research · 2026Review
- Effects of extraction solvents on the recovery of bioactive compounds from Platycladus orientalis Leaves of different tree ages: a comparative metabolomics approach.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Unveiling the Influence of Polyphenols on Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases in Cancer.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2026Review
- Myricetin InhibitsCells · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Myricetin, a naturally occurring flavonoid exhibits good anti-cancer properties. However, its practical application is limited due to poor aqueous solubility and low bioavailability. To overcome these challenges, a nanoemulsion-based formulation of myricetin was developed and its anti-tumor efficacy was compared with Myricetin alone in TNBC xenografts. Methods: Athymic nude mice were randomly divided into three groups (n=8) of control, Myricetin (50mg/kg), Myr-NE (25mg/kg), and subcutaneously implanted with MDA-MB-231 cells. After the 7-day treatment regimen, tumor volume was measured for up to 21 days, followed by mechanistic investigation, including tumor histology and immunoblotting. Tumor migration, invasion, cell proliferation kinetics, clonogenic, oxidative stress, and nuclear fragmentation studies were performed in tumor-derived cells. ANOVA test was further performed for statistical analysis to assess the significance between the experimental groups. Results: Myr-NE treatment substantially reduced tumor progression compared to Myricetin alone in TNBC xenografts. The invasion, proliferation, and clonogenicity of Myr-NE tumor-derived cells were significantly reduced compared to Myricetin. The mechanistic investigation revealed that Myr-NE treatment effectively inhibits the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling and VEGFR2, accompanied by a significant reduction in the level of tumorigenic factors, including HIF-1α, Ki67, and MMP9 proteins compared to Myricetin. Myr-NE treatment also showed increased oxidative stress and DNA damage, resulting in enhanced tumor cell death compared to Myricetin alone. Conclusion: Similar to our earlier observation in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.