Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40552244›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

Evaluation of a toolbox for the prevention of skin cancer among outdoor workers: an intervention study.

Florentine L de Boer, Daisy Vreenegoor, Jos W R Twisk, Jack J van der Gragt, Thomas Rustemeyer, Sanja Kezic, Henk F van der Molen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Florentine L de Boer *Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Daisy Vreenegoor *Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jos W R TwiskDepartment of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jack J van der GragtVolandis, Harderwijk, Netherlands.
Thomas RustemeyerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sanja KezicDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Henk F van der MolenDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Due to ultraviolet radiation (UVR) exposure at work, outdoor workers face a higher risk of keratinocyte carcinoma (KC) than indoor workers. This study evaluates the short-term effectiveness of a sun-safety risk communication toolbox aimed to increase sun-safety behavior among male outdoor workers. Methods: This parallel-controlled, non-randomized study included outdoor construction and arboricultural workers, recruited from five companies. Twenty-eight workers were assigned to the intervention group, where they received a preventive toolbox, while 26 workers were assigned to the control group. The toolbox included information on UVR health risks and preventive measures, as well as sunscreen provision. The primary outcome was internal UVR exposure, measured by the relative cis-urocanic acid (cUCA) levels in the stratum corneum (SC). SC samples were taken from two skin sites (cheek and neck) at baseline and 6 weeks. Secondary outcomes included sun-protective behavior, workplace encouragement, knowledge and attitude/motivation, all assessed using questionnaires. Results: A difference in cUCA was found between groups with lower cUCA at the cheek (-0.065 (95% CI: -0.101 to -0.029)) and neck location (-0.032 (95% CI: -0.068-0.004)) for the intervention group. Reported sunscreen use significantly improved in the intervention compared with control group (difference between group (11.01 (95% CI: 2.04-20.10)). For other secondary outcomes no statistical differences between groups were found. Conclusion: The toolbox intervention led to a reduction of internal UVR exposure, consistent with a self-reported increase in sunscreen use, compared to no intervention. Future research should focus on the longer-term preventive effects of this type of toolbox following further development and evaluation.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureSkin NeoplasmsAdultHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedSunlightSunscreening AgentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUltraviolet RaysSunscreening Agentsarboricultural workersconstruction workersnon-melanoma skin canceroccupational diseasesolar radiationstratum corneumsunscreen useultraviolet exposure

Identifiers

PMID40552244
PMCPMC12184205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.