ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Task integration and anticipation in complex, continuous motor tasks.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multitasking and sequential motor learning research has advanced greatly in recent years, yet commonly accepted insights are largely based on simple, distinct tasks which cannot accurately reflect the variety of more complex and continuous tasks we encounter in everyday life. This study therefore aims to reassess the influence of task integration on motor sequence learning in complex, continuous tasks through the use of a virtual reality environment and an adapted SRT dual task suited for continuous movements. In our experiment, participants performed a complex, bimanual motor sequence task with varying degrees of suitability for task integration. We could successfully show that task integration has beneficial effects on complex task acquisition if covariations between tasks are consistent and detrimental effects if covariations are too inconsitent or missing. Minor inconsistencies within a repeated sequence can however be mitigated. These results highlight the distinct influence of task integration on complex, continuous motor learning, yet emphasize the need for further research beyond distinct, simple tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.