Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40552197›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Task integration and anticipation in complex, continuous motor tasks.

Patrick Beißel, Stefan Künzell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Patrick BeißelInstitute of Sports Sciences, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Stefan KünzellInstitute of Sports Sciences, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multitasking and sequential motor learning research has advanced greatly in recent years, yet commonly accepted insights are largely based on simple, distinct tasks which cannot accurately reflect the variety of more complex and continuous tasks we encounter in everyday life. This study therefore aims to reassess the influence of task integration on motor sequence learning in complex, continuous tasks through the use of a virtual reality environment and an adapted SRT dual task suited for continuous movements. In our experiment, participants performed a complex, bimanual motor sequence task with varying degrees of suitability for task integration. We could successfully show that task integration has beneficial effects on complex task acquisition if covariations between tasks are consistent and detrimental effects if covariations are too inconsitent or missing. Minor inconsistencies within a repeated sequence can however be mitigated. These results highlight the distinct influence of task integration on complex, continuous motor learning, yet emphasize the need for further research beyond distinct, simple tasks.

Indexed as

anticipationcomplex motor taskimplicit motor learningsequence learningSRT tasktask integration

Identifiers

PMID40552197
PMCPMC12184655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.