ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Unraveling and rectifying the free-riding behavior among students in university flipped classrooms: a uninorm DEMATEL method.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Flipped classrooms move education toward a more student- and learning-centered pedagogy and practice. When flipped classrooms are applied, a free-riding phenomenon may occur when certain students in a group do not participate completely in group tasks but receive the same grade as the other students, which creates unfairness and is not conducive to the sustainable development of university education. As far as we know, quantifying the unfairness caused by free-riding in flipped classrooms is still a problem that needs to be addressed. Methods: This paper proposes a fair assessment framework to unravel and rectify student free-riding in flipped classrooms. Firstly, the uninorm DEcision-MAking Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) method is proposed to generate comprehensive indices of students. Secondly, the unfairness indices of groups and the discount parameters of students are determined based on the comprehensive index. The discounted scores are employed to modify students' achievement to ensure fairness. Results: A case study involving 57 students is presented to demonstrate the applicability of the proposed method, and a sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess its robustness. Four findings are uncovered. (1) Free-riding behavior exists in university flipped classrooms, and quantifying unfairness enables more targeted pedagogical interventions. (2) Discounted scores can enhance student motivation while promoting fairness. (3) Group scores do not show a direct correlation with unfairness indices. (4) The number of students does not exhibit a direct correlation with unfairness indices. Discussion: The fair assessment framework provides educational administrators with a tool for quantifying the effectiveness of course implementation, promoting the positive development of collaborative learning and the effective implementation of flipped classrooms, and contributing to the sustainable development of university education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.