Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40552175›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025

Predicting estrogen receptor status from HE-stained breast cancer slides using artificial intelligence.

Maren Høibø, Ute Spiske, André Pedersen, Borgny Ytterhus, Lars A Akslen, Elisabeth Wik, Cecilie Askeland, Ingerid Reinertsen, Erik Smistad, Marit Valla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Maren Høibø *Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Ute Spiske *Department of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
André PedersenApplication Solutions, Sopra Steria, Trondheim, Norway.
Borgny YtterhusDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.
Lars A AkslenCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Elisabeth WikCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Cecilie AskelandCentre for Cancer Biomarkers CCBIO, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Ingerid ReinertsenDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
Erik SmistadDepartment of Health Research, SINTEF Digital, Trondheim, Norway.
Marit VallaDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The estrogen receptor (ER) is routinely assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in breast cancer to stratify patients into therapeutic and prognostic groups. Pathology laboratories are burdened by an increased number of biopsies, and costly and resource-demanding molecular pathology analyses. Automatic, artificial intelligence-based prediction of biological properties from hematoxylin and eosin (HE)-stained slides could increase efficiency and potentially reduce costs at laboratories. The aim of this study was to develop a model for prediction of ER status from HE-stained tissue microarrays (TMAs). Our methodology can be used as proof-of-concept for the prediction of more complex and costly molecular analyses in cancer. Methods: In this study, TMAs from more than 2,000 Norwegian breast cancer patients were used to train and predict ER status using the clustering-constrained attention multiple-instance learning (CLAM) framework. Two patch sizes were evaluated, multi-branch and single-branch CLAM configurations were compared, and a comprehensive hyperparameter search with more than 16 000 experiments was performed. The models were evaluated on internal and external test sets. Results: On the internal test set, the proposed model achieved a micro accuracy, a macro accuracy, and an area under the curve of 0.91, 0.86, and 0.95, respectively. The corresponding results on the external test set were 0.93, 0.76, and 0.91, respectively. Using larger patch sizes resulted in significantly better classification performance, while no significant differences were observed when changing CLAM configurations.

Indexed as

breast cancerdeep learningdigital pathologyestrogen receptorhematoxylin and eosinmultiple instance learningtissue microarray

Identifiers

PMID40552175
PMCPMC12183256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.