ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
A comprehensive evaluation of a novel targeted-sequencing workflow for
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current Landscape of Molecular Diagnostic Tests and Emerging Tools for Tuberculosis and Drug Resistance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Associations of Mycoplasma pneumoniae load, co-infections, and macrolide resistance with clinical-laboratory profiles in hospitalized pediatric pneumonia: a targeted next-generation sequencing study of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2026Article
- A diagnostic performance study of multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based targeted next-generation sequencing for the accurate identification ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Advanced diagnostic methods for nontuberculous mycobacterial infections.Frontiers in tuberculosis · 2026Review
- Clinical utility of targeted next-generation sequencing for rapid detection, species differentiation, drug resistance profiling, and prognostic evaluation inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although several World Health Organization-endorsed targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS) assays exist for tuberculosis (TB) drug-resistance detection, their target selection and diagnostic accuracy vary widely. In this study, we developed a novel tNGS workflow (the TB Pro assay) and evaluated its performance in identifying Methods: The TB Pro assay was validated for identifying 10 Results: The assay demonstrated high sensitivity with a calculated LOD of 3.0 CFU/ml for MTB and 1.4-16.2 CFU/ml for most NTMs, except for Conclusions: The TB Pro assay represents a sensitive and specific solution for simultaneous mycobacterial identification and comprehensive drug-resistance profiling, performing robustly on both cultured isolates and direct clinical specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.