ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2025
TICTAC: target illumination clinical trial analytics with cheminformatics.
Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Identifying disease-target associations is a pivotal step in drug discovery, offering insights that guide the development and optimization of therapeutic interventions. Clinical trial data serves as a valuable source for inferring these associations. However, issues such as inconsistent data quality and limited interpretability pose significant challenges. To overcome these limitations, an integrated approach is required that consolidates evidence from diverse data sources to support the effective prioritization of biological targets for further research. Methods: We developed a comprehensive data integration and visualization pipeline to infer and evaluate associations between diseases and known and potential drug targets. This pipeline integrates clinical trial data with standardized metadata, providing an analytical workflow that enables the exploration of diseases linked to specific drug targets as well as facilitating the discovery of drug targets associated with specific diseases. The pipeline employs robust aggregation techniques to consolidate multivariate evidence from multiple studies, leveraging harmonized datasets to ensure consistency and reliability. Disease-target associations are systematically ranked and filtered using a rational scoring framework that assigns confidence scores derived from aggregated statistical metrics. Results: Our pipeline evaluates disease-target associations by linking protein-coding genes to diseases and incorporates a confidence assessment method based on aggregated evidence. Metrics such as meanRank scores are employed to prioritize associations, enabling researchers to focus on the most promising hypotheses. This systematic approach streamlines the identification and prioritization of biological targets, enhancing hypothesis generation and evidence-based decision-making. Discussion: This innovative pipeline provides a scalable solution for hypothesis generation, scoring, and ranking in drug discovery. As an open-source tool, it is equipped with publicly available datasets and designed for ease of use by researchers. The platform empowers scientists to make data-driven decisions in the prioritization of biological targets, facilitating the discovery of novel therapeutic opportunities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.