Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40552069›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025

Indocyanine green angiography processing and analysis pipeline for the assessment of indeterminate burn wounds.

Héctor A García, Mary I Junak, Bailey Donahue, Aiping Liu, Adam Uselmann, Brian W Pogue, Angela L F Gibson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Héctor A GarcíaUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Medical Physics, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5142-7149
Mary I JunakUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-3761-3814
Bailey DonahueUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-3101-5315
Aiping LiuUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.
Adam UselmannOnLume Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, United States.
Brian W PogueUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Department of Medical Physics, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9887-670X
Angela L F GibsonUniversity of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Madison, Wisconsin, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1181-7481

Funding

Fluorescence-based detection of inflammation and necrosis to inform surgical decision-making and enhance outcomesR01GM145723 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ANGELA L F GIBSON · 2022 to 2026
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM145723
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significance: Determining the depth of injury in burn wounds is critical to inform surgical decision-making and enhance outcomes. Clinical assessment yields poor accuracy in the early post-burn period, and histologic analysis of biopsies (the gold standard) is time-consuming and clinically unfeasible. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) has provided very promising results; however, the evidence is still limited, and the details on instrumentation, measurement setup, and data processing/analysis (when reported) are considerably heterogeneous. Aim: A processing and analysis pipeline was developed to interpret ICGA data from experimental burn studies in a way that provides objective, generalizable, and reproducible interpretation. Approach: Different burns were created on the dorsal aspect of adult pigs, and ICGA was performed. ICGA measurements were then compared with different processing steps. Features were extracted from the indocyanine green angiography (ICG) kinetics curves at specific regions of interests and ran individual and group analyses to decide on the wound severity. To this end, the features were analyzed both separately and groupwise. Results: The repeatability of the study was enhanced by processing steps where ICG curves were normalized by their area under the curve (AUC). Peak value ( Conclusions: We highlight the utility of a pre-processing step and judicious choice of parameters to use when interpreting ICGA data from indeterminate depth burn wounds to maximize the accuracy in severity estimation.

Indexed as

AngiographyBurnsImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIndocyanine GreenAnimalsReproducibility of ResultsSkinSwineIndocyanine Greenfluorescence-guided surgeryfluorescence imagingindocyanine green angiographynear-infrared spectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID40552069
PMCPMC12184791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.