ArticleJournal of biomedical optics2025
Indocyanine green angiography processing and analysis pipeline for the assessment of indeterminate burn wounds.
Article in Journal of biomedical optics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Diagnostic Value of Indocyanine Green in the Assessment of Depth of Burn Injuries: A Systematic Review.European burn journal · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Burn Depth using Indocyanine Green: Discrepancies Between Macroscopic Visualization and the Microenvironment.Plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2026Article
- [Indicative effect of indocyanine green-near-infrared fluorescence imaging in the thickness of necrotic dermal tissue in porcine burn wounds].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Significance: Determining the depth of injury in burn wounds is critical to inform surgical decision-making and enhance outcomes. Clinical assessment yields poor accuracy in the early post-burn period, and histologic analysis of biopsies (the gold standard) is time-consuming and clinically unfeasible. Indocyanine green angiography (ICGA) has provided very promising results; however, the evidence is still limited, and the details on instrumentation, measurement setup, and data processing/analysis (when reported) are considerably heterogeneous. Aim: A processing and analysis pipeline was developed to interpret ICGA data from experimental burn studies in a way that provides objective, generalizable, and reproducible interpretation. Approach: Different burns were created on the dorsal aspect of adult pigs, and ICGA was performed. ICGA measurements were then compared with different processing steps. Features were extracted from the indocyanine green angiography (ICG) kinetics curves at specific regions of interests and ran individual and group analyses to decide on the wound severity. To this end, the features were analyzed both separately and groupwise. Results: The repeatability of the study was enhanced by processing steps where ICG curves were normalized by their area under the curve (AUC). Peak value ( Conclusions: We highlight the utility of a pre-processing step and judicious choice of parameters to use when interpreting ICGA data from indeterminate depth burn wounds to maximize the accuracy in severity estimation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.