Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40552066›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Complications After Subpectoral and Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement in Women Undergoing Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy.

Seamus Caragher, Alisha Paranzino, Stephen Stearns, Libby Copeland-Halperin, Jessica Erdmann-Sager

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seamus CaragherFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Alisha ParanzinoPlastic & Reconstructive Surgery, University of Kentucky HealthCare, Lexington, KY.
Stephen StearnsFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Libby Copeland-HalperinCopeland Plastic Surgery, New York, NY.
Jessica Erdmann-SagerFrom the Division of Plastic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Placement of tissue expanders is a critical tool in breast reconstruction, particularly with postmastectomy radiation. Prepectoral tissue expander placement has rapidly gained popularity. As such, the precise effects of tissue expander plane selection on outcomes following radiotherapy remain a key question. Methods: All patients undergoing mastectomy and tissue expander placement followed by radiation at a single center between 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively examined. Clinical, oncological, surgical, and radiation treatment variables, as well as rate of complications before and after radiation, were collected. Multivariate analysis was performed. Results: The 2 groups had similar baseline clinical and oncological characteristics. Prepectoral placement was more common in bilateral reconstruction and had smaller final tissue expander volume to mastectomy specimen weight ratio. There was no difference in the rate of postoperative or radiation complications based on tissue expander location (17% versus 18%). Multivariable analysis identified acellular dermal matrix as a significant protective factor against perioperative complications (odds ratio [OR]: 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-0.78). Increased age and the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significant risk factors for radiation-related complications (age OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.02-6.63; Chemo OR: 16.7; 95% CI: 1.55-180). Conclusions: Prepectoral tissue expander placement can be safely used with postmastectomy radiation. These results highlight acellular dermal matrix use as a major protective factor against complications in these patients. Independently, increased age and the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased the risk of radiation-induced complications. The lack of significant risk with other variables can further assure surgeons of the safe use of prepectoral expanders in radiation-bound patients.

Identifiers

PMID40552066
PMCPMC12185071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.