ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Complications After Subpectoral and Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement in Women Undergoing Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction in the Setting of Post-Mastectomy Radiotherapy.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Outcomes of Acellular Dermal Matrix Use in Radiated Implant-based Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Subgroup Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Placement of tissue expanders is a critical tool in breast reconstruction, particularly with postmastectomy radiation. Prepectoral tissue expander placement has rapidly gained popularity. As such, the precise effects of tissue expander plane selection on outcomes following radiotherapy remain a key question. Methods: All patients undergoing mastectomy and tissue expander placement followed by radiation at a single center between 2019 and 2021 were retrospectively examined. Clinical, oncological, surgical, and radiation treatment variables, as well as rate of complications before and after radiation, were collected. Multivariate analysis was performed. Results: The 2 groups had similar baseline clinical and oncological characteristics. Prepectoral placement was more common in bilateral reconstruction and had smaller final tissue expander volume to mastectomy specimen weight ratio. There was no difference in the rate of postoperative or radiation complications based on tissue expander location (17% versus 18%). Multivariable analysis identified acellular dermal matrix as a significant protective factor against perioperative complications (odds ratio [OR]: 0.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-0.78). Increased age and the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were significant risk factors for radiation-related complications (age OR: 2.6; 95% CI: 1.02-6.63; Chemo OR: 16.7; 95% CI: 1.55-180). Conclusions: Prepectoral tissue expander placement can be safely used with postmastectomy radiation. These results highlight acellular dermal matrix use as a major protective factor against complications in these patients. Independently, increased age and the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy increased the risk of radiation-induced complications. The lack of significant risk with other variables can further assure surgeons of the safe use of prepectoral expanders in radiation-bound patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.