Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40552029›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary research2025

First report of

Anna Didkowska, Marta Majchrzak, Michał Załuski, Sylwia Brzezińska, Dawid Jańczak, Magdalena Nowak, Wiktoria Tchórz, Ewa Augustynowicz-Kopeć, Katarzyna Matusik, Paweł Parniewski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Journal of veterinary research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anna DidkowskaDepartment of Food Hygiene and Public Health Protection, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1073-174X
Marta MajchrzakInstitute of Medical Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 93-232 Łódź, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9092-5538
Michał ZałuskiThe Silesian Zoological Garden in Chorzów, 41-501 Chorzów, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4088-159X
Sylwia BrzezińskaDepartment of Microbiology, National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, National Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases Research Institute, 01-138 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0746-7063
Dawid JańczakDepartment of Infectious and Invasive Diseases and Veterinary Administration, Faculty of Biological and Veterinary Sciences, Nicolas Copernicus University in Toruń, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0845-0810
Magdalena NowakDepartment of Food Hygiene and Public Health Protection, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8814-2155
Wiktoria TchórzDepartment of Food Hygiene and Public Health Protection, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9605-3766
Ewa Augustynowicz-KopećDepartment of Microbiology, National Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory, National Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases Research Institute, 01-138 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6162-8748
Katarzyna MatusikDepartment of Food Hygiene and Public Health Protection, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences - SGGW, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4305-897X
Paweł ParniewskiInstitute of Medical Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 93-232 Łódź, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9074-2758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Over the past three decades, emerging epidemiological evidence has shown the increasing incidence and prevalence of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM). As a result, clinical awareness of the impact these organisms have on both human and animal health has grown. Material and Methods: Two captive black howler monkeys ( Results: Conclusion: Collecting clinical isolates from infected animals is vital for comparing them with other isolates, including those from the environment, and for re-evaluating their potential as pathogens. Our study is significant within the context of veterinary disease control and the One Health approach.

Indexed as

atypical mycobacteriaGiardia intestinalisMAHnonhuman primateszoonosis

Identifiers

PMID40552029
PMCPMC12182915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.