ArticleJournal of veterinary research2025
Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The prevalence of E198A and F200Y single nucleotide polymorphism in Haemonchus contortus populations from Polish goat herds.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Anthelmintic Resistance to Pour-On Eprinomectin Against Gastrointestinal Strongyles and Effects on Production Parameters in Early-Lactating Dairy Goats.Veterinary sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Pour-on eprinomectin (EPN) is the only anthelmintic currently available that is approved for use in lactating goats with a zero-day milk withdrawal period. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of the pour-on form of EPN with the efficacy of the injectable version of ivermectin (IVM) on goat farms in Slovakia. Material and Methods: The study was conducted from September to December 2023 on eight dairy-goat farms. The goats on six farms were divided into two groups of 10 animals each. The first group was administered pour-on EPN at the recommended dose for sheep and goats, and the second group was treated with injectable IVM at a dose 1.5-fold higher than the recommended dose for sheep. The goats on the remaining two farms were treated only with EPN. Efficacy was determined using the Results: The percent reductions for IVM and EPN ranged from 80.8 to 93.6 and 51.0 to 96.6, respectively. A substantially higher egg reduction on the 14 Conclusion: This study is the first to report reduced efficacy of the pour-on form of EPN in goat herds in Slovakia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.