ArticleJournal of veterinary research2025
Evaluation of sheep exposure to poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances through hair sample analysis.
Article in Journal of veterinary research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are a numerous group of synthetic organic compounds used in various industries. They pollute the natural environment and negatively affect humans and animals. The aim of the present investigation was to assess the exposure of sheep bred in the Kyrgyz Republic to six selected PFASs. Material and Methods: Six selected PFASs were assessed in 50 sheep (39 females and 11 males) of Kyrgyz and Arashan breeds ranging in age from 1 to 8 years (mean 2.1 ± 1.1), recruited equally from the Alamedin and Sokuluk regions. The substances were five perfluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (perfluorobutanoic acid - PFBuA, perfluoropentanoic acid - PFPeA, perfluorohexanoic acid - PFHxA, perfluoroheptanoic acid - PFHpA and perfluorooctanoic acid - PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulphonic acid (PFOS), and were determined through the liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry of hair samples. Results: All the listed PFASs were found in the studied hair samples. The highest concentrations were noted for PFPeA and PFBuA. The concentration of PFPeA ranged from 0.99 ng/g to 27.90 ng/g (mean 5.55 ± 4.54 ng/g) and that of PFBuA from 0.95ng/g to 14.18 ng/g (mean 2.24 ± 2.34 ng/g). The mean concentration levels of other PFASs were as follows: 1.06 ± 0.78 ng/g for PFHxA, 1.02 ± 0.76 ng/g for PFHpA, 0.87 ± 0.68 ng/g for PFOA and below the method quantification limit for PFOS. Clear differences in PFASs levels were noted between the two regions. Conclusion: Sheep are exposed to various PFASs, and sheep wool and items made of it may be the source of human exposure to these compounds. Hair samples may be used for biomonitoring of sheep exposure to PFASs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.