ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2025
Innervated Biomaterials for Improved Cutaneous Wound Healing: A Review of Recent Advancements and Future Prospects.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting the neuro-immune-skin axis: Advanced functional biomaterials for intelligent wound management and regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Article
- Biomaterial-assisted neuralization strategies for tissue engineering applications.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- A conductive MXene hydrogel reprograms immunity and autophagy to restore neurovascular repair in infected wounds.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Article
- The neuro-immune axis in preeclampsia: from the maternal-fetal interface to systemic dysregulation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cutaneous wound healing remains a significant clinical challenge, particularly for chronic and large-scale injuries, where functional recovery-especially sensory reinnervation-is often inadequate. Recent advances highlight the pivotal role of innervation in regulating tissue repair through neuropeptide signaling, immunomodulation, and angiogenesis. Despite progress in biomaterial-based therapies, most existing solutions focus on structural repair while neglecting neural regeneration, leading to suboptimal functional outcomes. This review explores emerging biomaterial strategies that integrate neuroregenerative capabilities with wound healing properties, including electroconductive scaffolds for bioelectric stimulation, neurotrophic factor-releasing matrices, and bioengineered constructs. We critically evaluate their mechanisms in promoting axonal regrowth, macrophage polarization, and vascular network formation, while addressing challenges in long-term functional integration. This review outlines the mechanisms of wound healing, existing treatments, and the vital role of nerves in the healing process. It also highlights materials that promote skin neuralization in cutaneous wound healing, aiming to inspire further research into these materials and the underlying mechanisms involved. By bridging the gap between neural and cutaneous regeneration, this work provides a roadmap for developing next-generation wound therapies that restore both structural integrity and sensory function. Future directions emphasize the need for standardized neuroregenerative assessment criteria and clinically translatable designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.