Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40551962›Full record

ArticleJournal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS2025

Totally Extraperitoneal Approach With Preperitoneal Repair for the Treatment of Midline Hernia Defects: A Case Series and Single-Center Experience.

Aritz Equisoain-Azcona, Javier García-Quijada García, Ramón Sanz-Ongil, Carlos Bustamante-Recuenco, Lucía Martínez-Minuesa, Álvaro Sobrino-Grande, Agustín Bertomeu-García, Francisco Javier Angulo-Morales

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aritz Equisoain-Azcona *Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja, San José y Santa Adela, Madrid, Spain.
Javier García-Quijada García *Universidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja, San José y Santa Adela, Madrid, Spain.
Ramón Sanz-OngilUniversidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja, San José y Santa Adela, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Bustamante-RecuencoUniversidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja, San José y Santa Adela, Madrid, Spain.
Lucía Martínez-MinuesaHospital Universitario de Getafe, Getafe, Spain.
Álvaro Sobrino-GrandeHospital Central de la Cruz Roja, San José y Santa Adela, Madrid, Spain.
Agustín Bertomeu-GarcíaUniversidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja, San José y Santa Adela, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco Javier Angulo-MoralesUniversidad Alfonso X el Sabio, Hospital Central de la Cruz Roja, San José y Santa Adela, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The introduction of laparoendoscopic techniques in abdominal wall surgery has transformed this field, growing exponentially in the last decade. The totally endoscopic preperitoneal approach (PeTEP) may offer advantages over traditional techniques by allowing complete anatomical restoration with lower morbidity. In order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this novel technique, we reviewed our results 1 year after its implementation. Material and methods: We perform a retrospective observational study including all patients aged over 18 years with midline hernias <8 cm with or without associated rectus diastasis who underwent PeTEP repair between March and December 2024 in our center. The evaluated outcomes included demographic characteristics, operative time, mesh size, length of hospital stay and morbimortality and recurrence rate. Results: Seventeen patients (10♂, 7♀) were included, with a mean age of 49.82 years (SD: 12.43). Multiple defects were observed in 88.2% of cases, with the M2-M3 combination being the most frequent (41.2%). The mean defect diameter was 2.88 cm (±1.62). The superior access was the most frequent (66.7%), and a mesh with a mean height of 29.71 cm and a mean width of 14.41 cm was used. No conversions to open surgery were recorded, although three cases (17.6%) required a change to the retromuscular plane (eTEP-RS), being all of them female patients. Complications were limited to two superficial hematomas (11.8%). The median hospital stay was 1 day. With a median follow-up of 87 days (IQR 143.5), no recurrences were detected. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the PeTEP approach is a safe and effective technique for small to medium-sized hernias with or without rectus diastasis. Additional studies with long-term follow-up and comparisons with pre-existing techniques are needed to confirm its benefits and establish its indications.

Indexed as

midline herniamorbidityPeTEPrectus diastasisrecurrence rate

Identifiers

PMID40551962
PMCPMC12183094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.