Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40551961›Full record

ArticleJournal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS2025

Ten-Year Results of Inguinal Hernia Open Mesh Repair.

Ceith Nikkolo, Toomas Lillsaar, Tiit Vaasna, Ülle Kirsimägi, Urmas Lepner

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06008535 (10-year Results of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair. A Prospective Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06008535 completednot on this map

10-year Results of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair. A Prospective Study

TypeobservationalSponsorTartu University HospitalRan2018 to 2023Enrolled234ConditionsRecurrence, Chronic PainArmsOpen inguinal hernia repair
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ceith NikkoloSurgery Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Toomas LillsaarRadiology Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Tiit VaasnaSurgery Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Ülle KirsimägiSurgery Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.
Urmas LepnerSurgery Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The primary aim of the present prospective study was to determine the clinical recurrence rate of inguinal hernia at a 10-year follow-up. Other aims included evaluating the recurrence rate based on ultrasound (US) examination and assessing chronic pain and foreign body feeling following open inguinal hernia repair. Methods: A pain questionnaire was completed 10 years after surgery. At the follow-up visit, the patients were examined for a recurrent hernia. For patients who completed a 10-year follow-up and did not have clinical hernia recurrence, an ultrasound of the inguinal canal was performed in addition to a clinical examination. Results: The data of 242 patients were analyzed at 10-year follow-up. At the 3-year follow-up, three clinical recurrences were diagnosed. Additionally, two recurrences were diagnosed between the 6-month and 3-year follow-up visits, and three were diagnosed between the 3-year and 10-year follow-up visits. At the 10-year follow-up visit, seven recurrences were clinically diagnosed, and in twenty-three cases, ultrasound detected recurrent inguinal hernias that were not clinically detectable. Of the patients, 94.5% (95% CI 91.8%-97.2%) are recurrence-free at the 10th postoperative year. Of the patients, 18.6% (95% CI, 14.0-24.2) experienced pain in the inguinal area during various activities, including at rest, upon coughing, when rising from a lying to a sitting position, and during physical activities. The mean VAS score was 37.6 (SD 21.5), based on the highest VAS score during different activities. Of the fifteen patients with clinically recurrent hernias, 66.7% reported pain during various activities. In contrast, the rate of chronic pain among patients without clinical hernia recurrence was significantly lower at 15.4% (p < 0.001). Of the twenty-three patients with US recurrence, 17.4% experienced pain in the inguinal area. The respective result among patients without US and clinical recurrence was 15.2% (p = 0.763). Foreign body feeling was reported by 26 patients (12.8%) without hernia recurrence, by three patients (20%) with clinical recurrence, and by two patients (8.7%) with ultrasound recurrence (p = 0.560). Conclusion: Considering the high rate of late recurrences, a follow-up of at least 10 years is necessary to determine the accurate recurrence rate after open inguinal hernia mesh repair. Further studies are needed to clarify the significance of US recurrences. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT06008535.

Indexed as

chronic painhernia recurrenceinguinal herniaLichtenstein repairself-gripping mesh

Identifiers

PMID40551961
PMCPMC12183091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.