ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2025
The
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ivermectin in the Management of Demodex -associated Blepharitis: A Comprehensive Literature Review.Eye & contact lens · 2026Review
- Proportion of patients with Demodex blepharitis in ophthalmology clinics in Europe: the Eos study.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Using Lotilaner Ophthalmic Solution, 0.25% to TreatClinical optometry · 2026Article
- Lotilaner ophthalmic solution 0.25% in the treatment ofSAGE open medical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To reach consensus on Methods: The Results: The DEPTH panel reached consensus that lotilaner ophthalmic solution, 0.25% should be the first-line treatment for DB. Experts agreed no additional clinical findings are needed to prompt treatment with lotilaner ophthalmic solution, 0.25% for patients with >10 collarettes (12/15), while one additional clinical finding is needed for patients with 0-2 (11/15) or 3-10 collarettes (10/15). In the absence of allergies, panelists would consider first-line treatment for DB in a patient with eyelid itching but without collarettes (weighted mean: 7.47; range: 2-9). Panelists agreed that blepharoexfoliation (weighted mean: 8.27; range: 3-9) or intense pulsed light (IPL) therapy (weighted mean: 8.4; range: 6-9) could supplement first-line treatment with lotilaner ophthalmic solution, 0.25%. The DEPTH panelists agreed that topical (10/15) and systemic ivermectin (14/15) are not their preferred treatment for DB. Experts did not reach consensus about the use of tea tree oil to treat DB. Conclusion: Experts achieved consensus on the use of lotilaner ophthalmic solution, 0.25% as the first-line treatment for patients with DB. Panelists also agreed that blepharoexfoliation or IPL therapy could serve supplementally to lotilaner ophthalmic solution, 0.25%, if needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.