Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40551932›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using TIGR® Matrix Surgical Mesh: Clinical Outcomes From Our First 100 Procedures.

Giorgio Caddia, Mellie Heinemann, Marie Osdoit, Sylvie Chabaud, Léa Rossi, Christelle Faure, Sophie Klingler, Maria A Dammacco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Giorgio CaddiaPlastic, Reconstructive, and Aesthetic Surgery Unit, Department of Human Pathology, Policlinico Universitario G. Martino, Messina, ITA.
Mellie HeinemannBreast Unit, Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, FRA.
Marie OsdoitBreast Unit, Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, FRA.
Sylvie ChabaudDepartment of Clinical Research and Innovation, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, FRA.
Léa RossiBreast Unit, Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, FRA.
Christelle FaureBreast Unit, Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, FRA.
Sophie KlinglerBreast Unit, Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, FRA.
Maria A DammaccoBreast Unit, Department of Surgical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, FRA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Implant-based reconstruction has advanced with the introduction of acellular dermal matrices (ADMs). However, ADMs are associated with higher complication rates. Synthetic meshes have emerged as cost-effective alternatives. This retrospective, single-center study evaluates the clinical outcomes of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction with TIGR® Mesh (Novus Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden) on 76 patients (100 breasts) performed between February 2020 and June 2022. Methods Eligible patients were ≥18 years old with no major comorbidities and underwent direct-to-implant (DTI) mastectomy. Complications were assessed using the Clavien-Dindo classification (grade III or higher). Cosmetic outcomes were refined with lipofilling when required. Results The mean patient age was 45.5 years, with a mean follow-up of 17.3 months. Twelve mesh-related grade III complications were observed (10 infections and two seromas) over a total of 21 events. Implant loss occurred in 10 cases, which were later reconstructed in a subsequent procedure. No variable was identified as a significant predictor of complications. A significant inverse correlation (p=0.03) was found between mastectomy weight and complication rate, with lower weights associated with higher risk. Additionally, 57 reconstructions required at least one lipofilling session, with heavier mastectomy specimens needing fewer sessions. Conclusions TIGR® Mesh demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, with infection and seroma rates falling within the lower range reported for synthetic meshes and lower than most ADM series. Its cost-effectiveness and favorable outcomes support its use in selected patients. Further prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Indexed as

breast cancerimplant-based breast reconstructionmastectomysynthetic meshtigr matrix

Identifiers

PMID40551932
PMCPMC12184957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.