ArticleCureus2025
Ravulizumab is Effective and Safe for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Patients in Various Clinical Settings: A Single-Center Case Series with Concomitant Use of Rituximab.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Switching from complement inhibitors in AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD: clinical characteristics, an operational "cluster phase" and potential strategies to prevent therapeutic gaps.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Ravulizumab for relapse prevention in AQP4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a 2-year follow-up case report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Ravulizumab During the Acute Phase of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder.Case reports in neurological medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune disease characterized by inflammation of the optic nerves and spinal cord, often associated with anti-aquaporin-4 antibodies. Ravulizumab (RVZ), a monoclonal antibody targeting complement protein C5, has shown promise in reducing relapse rates and preventing neurological deterioration. However, studies reporting its use in specific clinical circumstances, such as switching from or to other biologics, or during infectious episodes such as COVID-19, are scarce. This case series presents four patients with NMOSD treated with RVZ, highlighting its effectiveness and safety in diverse scenarios. Notably, two patients transitioned from satralizumab to RVZ without relapse or elevated infection risk, supporting RVZ as a viable alternative. However, persistent neurological symptoms affecting quality of life, despite relapse control, emphasize the need for more comprehensive care beyond relapse prevention. All four patients received concomitant RVZ and rituximab (RTX) for a duration of six months, during which no notable adverse events were recorded. Furthermore, neurological symptoms that had affected their quality of life were alleviated by RTX. One patient with acute COVID-19 was successfully managed with RVZ, demonstrating its potential role during infectious episodes. The study also questions the reliability of serum 50% hemolytic complement (CH50) levels for monitoring RVZ efficacy. Fluctuations in CH50 were observed, but all values normalized shortly after RVZ administration, suggesting that the timing of blood collection affects the results. CH50 levels above the detection threshold were observed only in samples collected immediately before the next RVZ administration. Therefore, it was considered appropriate to use samples obtained shortly after RVZ administration to assess the efficacy of RVZ based on CH50 levels. In conclusion, RVZ offers effective relapse prevention and versatility in NMOSD management, even in challenging clinical contexts. In some cases, administration of RVZ resulted in mild improvements in symptoms such as pain, stiffness, and numbness. The transition from RVZ to RTX was achieved safely without the use of corticosteroids, as no increase in adverse events such as infections, nor any rise in NMOSD relapses during the initial phase of RTX induction, was observed, even during six months of concomitant administration. Further studies are warranted to evaluate whether the relapse rate in patients who switched to RTX using this method is comparable to that in patients who initiated RTX in combination with conventional steroids. Additionally, research is needed to establish safe switching strategies from RVZ to other biologic agents such as satralizumab or inebilizumab.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.