ArticleCureus2025
Distal Clavicle Osteolysis in a 30-Year-Old Male: A Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distal clavicle osteolysis (DCO) is an overuse injury characterized by pain and bone resorption at the acromioclavicular (AC) joint due to repetitive microtrauma. Early diagnosis is critical to prevent prolonged symptoms and functional impairment, as conservative treatment is most effective when initiated promptly. We present the case of a 30-year-old male who initially injured his right shoulder during a fall in judo and reinjured it while lifting a patient. He reported persistent AC joint pain exacerbated by overhead activities and wearing a lead apron during surgery. Physical examination revealed localized AC joint tenderness with positive Jobe, Speed, and Cross Arm tests. Imaging studies included X-rays showing AC joint widening and MRI findings consistent with DCO. Conservative management - rest, activity modification, and range-of-motion exercises - was initiated, and pharmacological or surgical interventions were deferred. The patient experienced ongoing functional limitations due to delayed diagnosis, initially being misdiagnosed with rotator cuff tendonitis. With a formal diagnosis of DCO, conservative treatment was implemented. The patient opted to defer corticosteroid injections or the Mumford procedure but was counseled on these options should symptoms persist. This case highlights the importance of early and accurate diagnosis of DCO to prevent unnecessary suffering and optimize outcomes. Timely imaging and a thorough clinical assessment are essential for distinguishing DCO from other shoulder pathologies. Conservative management remains effective if initiated early, reducing the likelihood of surgical intervention and improved patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.