Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40551901›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Psychological Impact of Prophylactic Total Gastrectomy in Patients Who Are High Risk for Hereditary Diffuse Gastric Cancer: A Review of the Literature.

Muhammad Y Hayat, Usman Yakubu, Jayan Jayasinghe, Bijendra Patel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Muhammad Y HayatTrauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR.
Usman YakubuInfectious Disease, The Royal Oldham Hospital, Manchester, GBR.
Jayan JayasingheColorectal and General Surgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Bijendra PatelSurgical Science, Barts Cancer Institute, London, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-risk patients for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) are commonly offered a prophylactic total gastrectomy (PTG). This includes patients with a germline CDH1 or CTNNA1 mutation and occasionally patients with variants of unknown pathogenicity. Whilst the psychological impact (PI) of curative total gastrectomy (TG) for gastric cancer (GC) has been well documented in the literature, there is a lack of consensus on how PTG affects this group of patients. Hence, this literature review aims to elucidate what is known about the PI of PTG. A narrative review of the literature was carried out using a comprehensive search strategy on Ovid Medline, EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, and Web of Science. After full-text screening, 12 citations were included to investigate the PI of PTG. Domains were classified for themes relating to the PI of PTG. Themes that emerged for the PI of PTG included effects on emotional functioning, anxiety, depression, social life, body image, work and daily life, relationship with food, regret, cancer-related anxiety, and effects on intimate relationships. All domains identified for the PI of PTG are complexly interlinked with the long-term clinical outcomes of PTG. All patients suffer from long-term morbidity, and those who tolerate PTG well, with improving physical symptoms over time, have better psychological outcomes. Alternatively, patients who experience persistent and severe long-term consequences of PTG have poorer psychological outcomes. PTG is an established form of risk reduction, and care should be taken to address the PI of this procedure.

Indexed as

cdh1clinical outcomefamilial gastric cancerhereditary diffuse gastric cancerprophylactic total gastrectomypsychological impact

Identifiers

PMID40551901
PMCPMC12185130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.