Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40551899›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2025

Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training in elite versus recreational athletes.

Sumaira Aslam, Jean De Dieu Habyarimana, Shi Yong Bin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07546513 (Effects of Cistanche Supplementation on Anaerobic Exercise Performance and Recovery in Men With Different Athletic Training Levels), which is not on this map. Cited by 40 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07546513 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Cistanche Supplementation on Anaerobic Exercise Performance and Recovery in Men With Different Athletic Training Levels: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Sport UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled56ConditionsAthlete, Elite Athlete, Sport Performance, Exercise RecoveryArmsCistanche deserticola, Matched placebo paste, Standardized anaerobic training program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sumaira AslamDepartment of Physical Education, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Jean De Dieu HabyarimanaDepartment of Physical Education, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Shi Yong BinDepartment of Physical Education, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training drive strength and performance improvements, but differences between elite and recreational athletes remain underexplored. Understanding the underlying mechanisms can refine training approaches and enhance athletic development. This review synthesized findings from the past decade regarding how training status, age, sex, and genetics influence neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training, identified key gaps in the literature, and provided practical recommendations for tailoring training to different athletic levels. This critical review synthesized evidence on neuromuscular adaptations to resistance training, focusing on muscle hypertrophy, architectural changes, motor unit recruitment, neural drive, fiber-type transitions, and genetic influences. Methodological limitations and gaps were highlighted, with a focus on elite versus recreational populations. Muscle hypertrophy and strength gains occur rapidly in novices but plateau in advanced athletes, requiring more complex stimuli. Neural adaptations, including improved motor unit synchronization and reduced antagonist co-contraction, distinguish elite from recreational athletes. Genetic predispositions and training history further modulate adaptations. Fatigue, recovery, and injury risk differ between groups, underscoring the need for tailored monitoring and recovery strategies. Research gaps include inconsistent methodologies, limited elite athlete data, and underrepresentation of female cohorts. Future studies should integrate neurophysiological tools and long-term designs to clarify these mechanisms. Effective training requires adjusting intensity and volume based on an athlete's training status. Foundational strength programs benefit youth, while elite athletes require periodization and advanced methods. Policy-level support for supervised resistance training in youth can enhance performance and injury resilience. Addressing these insights can optimize training outcomes across athletic levels.

Indexed as

athletic developmentfatigue managementhypertrophymotor unit recruitmentperiodization

Identifiers

PMID40551899
PMCPMC12183069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.