ArticleCase reports in ophthalmology
Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Culture-Negative
Article in Case reports in ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: For cases of culture-negative endophthalmitis, 16S ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid (16S RNA) real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) may offer greater diagnostic yield than traditional microbial cultures. Our case presents an unusual clinical course, which supports the use of 16S RNA RT-PCR, even after negative microbial cultures, to secure a pathogenic diagnosis. Case Presentation: A 49-year-old male with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection presented with fever and cough, accompanied by acute bilateral vision reduction, photophobia, and eye pain. Clinically, his examination showed severe panuveitis in both eyes. Investigations showed elevated white blood cells, C-reactive protein, cluster of differentiation 4 count of 180/μL, HIV viral load of <40 copies/mL, and unexpectedly, aqueous and blood cultures were negative. An autoimmune workup was also negative. Given this, intravitreal antibiotics were administered alongside systemic antibiotics. Subsequent chest computed tomography showed pulmonary cavitations and liver lesions, and despite negative culture results, a 16S rRNA RT-PCR of the aqueous humor detected Conclusion: Clinicians may consider alternative etiologies after a negative microbial culture. This teaching case supports the use of 16S RT-PCR to more rigorously rule out infectious causes of panuveitis, especially in immunocompromised patients, to avoid premature consideration of other differential diagnoses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.