ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Identifying Yalom's group therapeutic factors in anonymous mental health discussions on Reddit: a mixed-methods analysis using large language models, topic modeling and human supervision.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discussion themes and emotional expressions on Chinese social media regarding AI virtual companions: a topic modeling and sentiment analysis study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Exploring negative experiences in psychotherapy using an NLP approach on online forum data.Npj mental health research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Online communities provide valuable, peer-led spaces for discussing mental health issues, offering support that can complement traditional therapy. In this study, we adopt an interpretive approach by applying Yalom's group therapeutic factors to explore how mental health-focused Reddit discussions may reflect group therapy processes. Methods: We propose a practical methodological framework for large-scale qualitative research. Using a mixed-methods approach, we integrate advanced Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques-including Large Language Models (GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k), cosine similarity, and BERTopic-with human validation to analyze 6,745 comments from mental health-focused Subreddits. Results: The results show that a large portion of the data can be interpreted through Yalom's therapeutic factors, such as Instillation of Hope, Group Cohesion, and Altruism, suggesting a generally supportive and empathetic online environment. However, unfiltered negative dynamics, including shared suffering and maladaptive coping strategies, also appeared in the discussions. Discussion: By grounding NLP-based analyses in a well-established therapeutic framework and incorporating human expertise, we demonstrate a transparent, scalable approach to examining large-scale online mental health data. These findings underscore the potential of online communities for enhancing peer-led mental health support, while emphasizing the importance of theoretical grounding in interpreting such digital spaces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.